75
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

A second problem is the public doesn’t know any other Democrat nearly as well as they know Biden, and it would be difficult to introduce someone to the public at this late date without them being defined by Donald Trump, the Republicans and Fox News in the worst possible ways.

The only people I can think of as possible nominees are Kamala Harris, Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro, Wes Moore, Gavin Newsom and (my personal favorite) Sherrod Brown.

. . . What? Of those names I recognize I’m pretty sure the faded lettuce of Liz Truss has more immediate electability. And Whitmer is right out. As is (don’t get me started) Harris.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Harris is the most viable option, but she's also less charismatic than Biden, and is a "Monkey's Paw" style answer to those on the left calling for a non-Biden candidate.

[-] BabyVi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Is she less charismatic than current Biden though..? I haven't seen her speak in awhile but from what I remember it wasn't that bad. Not a fan of her politics by any stretch but right now I'd support her in a heartbeat.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Is she less charismatic than current Biden though…?

Biden after the debate? Definitely less charismatic.

Biden during the debate? Probably less charismatic.

I've seen her get flustered by enough softball questions to have no faith in her ability to persuade the electorate of her competence, regardless of whether she is competent or not.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's fucking amazing that these are the DNC's top 2 picks out of 350 million people.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, she doesn't seem any more likable than Hillary (to hear some of the pundits), but that probably just comes down to misogyny, and piled on top of that - racism.

If they are going to bother to replace Biden, I hope they go with Newsom. Not much of a lefty, but if the alternative is fascism...

[-] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Why is Whitmer right out? I'm in Michigan, so I may not have a good perspective on what the rest of the US thinks of her.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I appreciate her progressive takes, I just don’t think she has a chance in a national presidential run.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Gavin Newsom is not as left as I'd like, but I think someone like him, just by virtue of being telegenic and several decades younger than both donnie and Biden, he'd tear donnie a new one at the polls I would think. I mean, if we are talking about winning elections here.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
75 points (75.2% liked)

politics

18601 readers
3888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS