1172
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bidens guys already came out saying they don't want to reform the Supreme Court. It's not on the ballot this cycle.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago

Yeah I just saw that. Ridiculous.
And in 2 years he'll probably "regret" not doing anything.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

2 years he might come to regret that decision in January when Trump usess his new powers to lock his ass up.

If fucking Biden lose in November he better use that new gift to stop Trump. Dumbass really wants to use this to fundraiser on, Biden so out of fucking touch he got no clue that we are just this vote away from a Christofascist state.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

He knows, but the thing is that the Democrats are about as afraid of fascism as you are gasoline in your car. They use the threat of fascism to help scare people to the polls and to donate money, which is partly why they never seem to be in a big hurry to squash it. Problem being, of course, that people eventually get fear fatigue and stop paying attention. Kinda like how in the wake of 9/11, the government would announce terror threat levels, and they were always orange or red, indicating super double plus serious danger, and eventually people stopped caring because life must go on. Well, people get fatigued of it and then the fascists win again, which provides another big, though temporary, shot of support to the democrats. Meanwhile, the democrats don't have to make any real, serious campaign or policy commitments besides "don't be fascist". Everything else they do (and don't get me wrong, they do some good stuff sometimes) is just running up the score. So, for the centrist democrats that run the DNC and Biden campaign, this feels like a pretty good Wednesday for fundraising, even though we all see it as the literal end of the Republic. They've been walking on the ice so long, they're convinced that while it is thin, they couldn't possibly fall through.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plenty of the sitting Dems in Congress are millionaires who think they will do well under fascism anyway.

The Dems LARP as an anti-GOP force while secretly being OK with the GOP policies. It's all theater for the plebs, to convince us the lesser evil is keeping a larger evil at bay. All lies.

That's why the Dems are so goddamn anemic. The Dems love the status quo too, they just want little tweaks here and there, nothing disruptive.

Gavin Newsom (D) is why California does not have single payer healthcare today.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In 2 years he'll be in a Federal prison (if not executed). Trump has basically promised it.

Refusing to stop Trump is literally suicidal on Biden's part.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Not just suicide at this point. We're looking at massacres. If Trump takes power by any means, political prisoners are guaranteed. It's the only way they stay powerful. And political prisoners have a very short lifespan.

Once political prisoners are taken, it's all downhill from there.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

That's why I didn't say 4 years lol

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[-] localme@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the link. Here’s the least bad news from the article:

Even more dispiriting for Americans who want to see real reform? The most optimistic view any of the campaign surrogates could offer Monday was a promise that Biden would at least “have conversations” about court reform that would be non-starters under Trump. 

Crockett is part of a group of Democratic lawmakers advancing three separate pieces of court reform legislation — bills that would expand the court, implement term limits, and impose a binding ethics code on justices, respectively. “If we get the House, these are bills that we are going to try to push forward with,” Crockett said Monday. “I can guarantee you that if Trump is elected, he will never sign these into law.”

She added: “If Joe Biden is elected, we can at least sit down, have conversations and talk about why it’s important to institute these court reforms.”

For now, the prospect of future conversations is the most that Biden campaign surrogates can offer American voters — which is more than than the campaign itself was offering.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Even more dispiriting for Americans who want to see real reform? The most optimistic view any of the campaign surrogates could offer Monday was a promise that Biden would at least “have conversations” about court reform that would be non-starters under Trump.

This is the same language they used in 2020 for all the progressive stuff. That he then did nothing substantive on.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

And his die hard supporters on here wonder why people don't want to vote for Biden just because it keeps Trump out of office. Biden isn't fighting this fight. The democrats are asleep at the wheel, another 4 years of, "oh no, poor me, SCOTUS said we can't do this, we just have to executive order the most conservative policy in 60 years." Does not excite the people who are willing to go vote.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
1172 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18114 readers
3532 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS