126

An Iranian monarchist who filmed herself pulling the headscarves off Iranians in London fled to Israel after UK police announced they were investigating her.

The woman allegedly responsible is an Iranian pro-Israel activist called Bahar Mahroo, who later closed her Instagram and TikTok accounts and claimed she found the videos online. However, a reserve image search found no sources for the video, other than her Twitter account.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

There's no mention of Hijabs in the Quran and "dress modestly" is very much relative. You also may or may not see Turks drinking plum wine but they're definitely drinking beer and most definitely Raki.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes alcohol is now halal too. Everything is halal if a Turkish person does it. That is what I have learned today.

As I said, there is no debate about this among scholars whatsoever. Every scholar except sheikh barsoap agrees that covering the hair is obligatory.

https://blog.hautehijab.com/post/10399809-ask-haute-hijab-is-hijab-really-mandatory-fard

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab#Alternative_views

"Clear and decisive scholarly consensus" my ass. There might be if you're ignoring everyone who disagrees.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

According to Karen Armstrong,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Armstrong Karen Armstrong OBE FRSL (born 14 November 1944) is a British author and commentator of Irish Catholic descent.

My bad I did not know about sheikh Karen. These Christian Europeans know so much more about Islam.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

So you picked out one non-Muslim (a scholar of comparative religion) among the many Muslims, with doctorates in Islamic Law from Arab universities and everything, to dismiss all of it.

I tried not to but I have to start to doubt your intellectual honesty. Not towards me, I don't care, but towards yourself.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The first paragraph contained no reasoning. Only statements. The second with the supposed reasoning is written by Karen.

I read your link. You did not.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

All three paragraphs are written by wikipedia authors summing up longer texts by various scholars. If you want to actually engage with the topic on a deeper level, read those scholars, not just the summary. It's all linked (those numbers in brackets). Ignore the Christian if you please, noone will blame you.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I already read your article my previous link already debunked everything in it.

You should consider reading and be intellectually honest instead.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

There is, in fact, a clear mention of hijab in the Quran. More than one in fact.

[-] footoro@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I can’t believe I’m getting involved in this but then you can surely show where it’s mentioned clearly?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands... until the end of the verse.

Surah al nur, verse 31.

It then explicitly assumes that they're wearing a headcover. The main debate around this verse and similar ones is whether the face and hands must be covered or not, and not whether everything else must be covered.

[-] footoro@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Aha and which translation did you choose?

Do you speak Arabic? More explicitly, to an extent that would allow you to understand the nuances in a verse like that?

I’m asking because I still don’t see any proof that it is clearly written anywhere.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Aha and which translation did you choose? This seems rather odd.

I don't remember, but the Arabic word used means "head covering".

Do you speak Arabic? More explicitly, to an extent that would allow you to understand the nuances in a verse like that?

I'm a native speaker so yes.

[-] footoro@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

طب وأنا عربي كمان بس ولا عمري رح احكيلك انو فاهم اشي من القران لانو لغة القران مش لغتنا وحتى العربي الي بدو يدرس الدين لازم سنة وهو بدرس عربي بس عشان عن جد يفهم وأنا مش فاهم عربي لهالدرج وإذا أنا مش شيخ مش عارف كيف انت بدك تفهم هيك منيح لتعمل فتوى للناس

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

أنا فاهم قصدك بس الموضوع برده مش صعب للدرجة. الآية بتقول خمار و كلمة خمار معناها غطاء الرأس في اللغة العربية مش محتاجة فتاوى. +أنا دورت قبل ما اتكلم فده كلام علماء مش كلامي.

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
126 points (92.6% liked)

World News

37462 readers
1972 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS