1088
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago

How about shut up about this until elections are over? Yes, you're all right about this, Biden is an old fart that should not be president. President should not be older than 65, period.

But there is Trump, and that, well, trumps all. Trump CANNOT become president afian, period

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

You cannot will away reality. No amount of willful ignorance will make undecided people vote for Biden.

[-] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago

But looking at Trump's plans will.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

You're assuming people are going to do that well, or at all.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

You got a point there.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Why would the quality of his opponent make me vote for a corpse? Biden isnt going to be cognizant enough to serve his term, if hes even alive. And certainly no president at all is worse than trump

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Because the "quality" of his opponent is that he'll convert the US in a theocratic dictatorship?

Not my words, his words with that insane project 2025 plan. Basically from those two, you can extract the following points: If you like democracies and still want to be able to vote in 2028, don't vote trump. If you're a woman and want to have any rights whatsoever left, you will not want to vote trump. If you're a woman and dont want to die of treatable complications with pregnancy, don't vote trump. If you like sex (huuuhhh) then don't vote trump. If you like workers rights, dislike discrimination of any kind, don't vote trump. If you're LGBT, don't vote trump. If you don't have a nice white skin color, don't vote Trump. If you like the environment and dont want to die from climate change, air pollution or whatever, then don't vote trump

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Sure, that's not the point though. If someone is opposed to voting for Biden because of his age then ignoring the problem will not make them magically more inclined to vote for Biden.

If we're fighting for our future then we should have the best candidate,, not the default option.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

And so they'll vote for a guy who said multiple times he'll turn the US into a dictatorship? The guy who has project 2025 for his policies to make it a theocratic dictatorship?

Yeah Biden is demented and senile but at this point I'd prefer a soft boiled egg over trump.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

To be fair, Biden is not demented. He is showing signs of senility though. Which is why he should step down and allow any well functioning Democrat to take his place. Because if undecided voters considered anything Trump said to be a disqualifying statement, they would not be undecided. And polling in Pennsylvania, they state Democrats really really need to win the Electoral College, is going the wrong way. There's a moment in every presidential campaign season where the polling trend lines diverge and do not come back together. It's usually when the independents/undecideds break for one candidate or another.

But it's also seen when a candidate has a structural issue they cannot fix, or cannot fix in time. Swiftboating for Kerry, Palin as VP for McCain, Binders full of Women for Romney. And now that debate in June for Biden. He's had the scandal recovery period and he hasn't patched it up, instead it's just getting worse. So yes. You cannot let the echo chamber keep you all fuzzy and warm. We don't have to repeat 2016, it's not too late.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yes, Caligula's horse would be a preferable vote to cast over Trump.

That doesn't mean a wise opposition to Trump would choose to run Caligula's horse.

The question of "who to vote against in the general election" and "who is the best candidate to put forward as nominee in the general election" are very different questions.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

President should not be older than 65, period.

Why 65 specifically? Why not 64 or 66?

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

65 is supposed to be the age of retiremenr for a normal career

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

65 is supposed to be the age of retiremenr for a normal career

"Supposed to"

In Washington DC it's 67. In Virginia it's 61. In 1991 it was 57. It's based on arbitrary convention, not for any medical reason.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well, that should be standardized then, and 65 seems like a nice median

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well, that should be standardized then, and 65 seems like a nice median

Based on what?

I've known high energy 80 year olds who were sharp as a tack and 50 year olds with early onset dementia or who were just plain nuts to begin with.

This isn't about age.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Youre entirely right. How exactly will you enforce a law that says "unless youre still sharp as a tack at 80", though? There has to be a provable line or else the law is meaningless.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

All candidates for elected office should undergo standardized cognitive and psychological testing. The latter should include things like personality and bipolor disorder tests and some kind of personality test if there even one that is roughly valid (I don't know). These tests should not bar anyone from office necessarily but the results should be made public so voters can assess for themselves. These tests should be completed immediately after the candidate files to run.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Well a law is a hell of a lot harder to enforce if it's not drawing a line somewhere in the sand, and I'd rather disqualify someone we should than qualify someone we shouldn't

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Perfectly happy to draw a line in the sand, it should just be based on what we care about - competence, intelligence, experience, not being a raging psychopath... that kind of thing. Saying 65 is too old is no better than saying 35 is too young.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I like all of those things. Can we draw the sand line now?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

65 is a typical pension age. We could make it 60 too, really

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Lol because...?

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

A) Biden is going to lose to trump. B) The only chance we have to have a living president thats not trump is to nominate someone else. Anybody sane has already written off biden as dead. I guarantee you the entire white house staff has.

[-] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Do you think trump wont be around in 4 years?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Trumps health really isn't better than Biden. Save for mental state (where he isn't very far behind biden) Trump is in a much worse state, physically, than Biden. There is a good chance both of them aren't around anymore 4 years from now

load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
1088 points (96.7% liked)

Political Memes

5509 readers
1119 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS