this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
762 points (97.6% liked)

News

36201 readers
2771 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Man this entire thread is just a perfect encapsulation of the perfect being the enemy of the good. What a bunch of useless chuds.

[–] abracaDavid@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago

We want actual change.

Not this half-assed thing of "oh shit Biden isn't polling well. Quick, do something popular!".

Seeing this honestly frustrates me more because we all know they could do better than this.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I've ever heard that phrase. Do you mind explaining what you mean? (Just to be clear, I'm not trying to be combative. I just have no idea how to read that)

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It has it's own wiki page!

In simple terms, the failure to do something absolutely perfectly shouldn't stop you from doing something that will still be better than the status quo.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What if the act of doing something carries a cost with a negative expected return on investment?

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...then the original saying doesn't apply, does it? Is this some kind of "gotcha" I'm not understanding?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

…then the original saying doesn’t apply, does it?

And that's the million dollar question. I'm not arguing the perfect should be the enemy of the good. I'm questioning how much "good" I get by aligning myself with a fundamentally bad dude. Biden's played this bait-and-switch game before, and there's a real reason to believe 2025 Joe Biden won't be willing or able to deliver on his 5% rent cap promise. In exchange, what is he asking you to give up?

An hour of your life in line to vote on election day? A small recurring donation to his campaign? A week block-walking your neighborhood to canvas for him? Three months volunteering to work for his reelection campaign?

Presidential elections aren't cheap. I have to wonder what would happen if all the money and manpower pouring into Biden's coffers was simply directed towards Habitat For Humanity instead. Would we get more bang for our bucks?

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago

Dawg, I'm not even the OP. I was just explaining an idiom, and you expect me to answer a humanist philosophical question as if I'm the greatest thinker of our generation 😭

I can't help you decide what extent you're willing to compromise to vote Biden/democrats. I can't even vote in the US.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

that doesn't sound very good to me

[–] TotesIllegit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

"Don't make perfect the enemy of good" essentially says that it's better to do what you can in the short term to reduce harm or make positive change than to wait for the perfect solution and do nothing in the meantime. The idea is that the good is still going to help some people while we wait for the perfect solution to the problem- which, crucially, may never come, or come too late for a whole bunch of people.

One example would be letting a parent having their kid eat fast food instead of a perfectly healthy diet because their parents live in a food desert; not ideal, but it'll keep the kid fed and alive.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -2 points 2 years ago

This guy really larps these this trust me bro jaja