766
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Boomers are having their last dance in charge.
  • Gen X leaders are stepping up to replace the last of them.
  • Younger leaders are taking charge of politics and corporate giants such as Boeing, HSBC, and Costco.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] computerscientistII@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Kamala was born in 64. She's a boomer. Also, GTFO with Generation Jones. She's a boomer. X-ers are those who came after the pill became omnipresent after the mid 60s. I am one of those (born in 77). We are relatively few in numbers in comparison to the boomers. Because of the pill. Also GTFO with Generation Jones. She's a boomer.

Trump and Biden also aren't boomers. They predate the boomers. They were born during or shortly after WW2. That's usually called the silent generation. Trump being part of the silent generation is of course ridiculous. But he's the exception of the rule, I guess. But both are born very late in that generation, so they are its last remnants I guess. Soon they will all be gone.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Boomers is short for Baby Boomers which were literally the babies born after WW2 vets came home and had families. I don't know why your misinformed comment has so many upvotes

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's the fact you're objecting to? The only thing wrong is Trump as a Silent as he's born in the very first year of the Boomers. Everything else is following the common definitions.

[-] computerscientistII@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

You might be right there. I'm German. And many a man did come back later, after the war, here. A lot of refugees were forcefully relocated from what is today Poland. Also a lot of POWs came back long after the war was over. So the baby boom was a bit delayed over here.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Then again, you're a computer scientist, not an historian, and therefore excusable :p

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

It all depends on whether you start counting from 0 or 1!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Where does the common definition of 'Boomer' say it starts after 1946 (the year Trump was born) and stops with the birth control pill (1960)?

I have never seen such a definition anywhere. Certainly not one that says it starts at least two years after the end of WWII.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Huh? I'm saying Trump is Boomer because Boomers start in 1946. And it goes to 1964, which is when the birth control pill was recognized as a contraceptive. I don't know if X is defined by that in the same way Boomers are defined by a specific event, but it lines up precisely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomers

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

I guess you didn't read down very far since it talks about multiple definitions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomers#Date_range_and_definitions

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

You literally just asked about where the common definition came from. Read the first fucking paragraph man.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

I did not ask anything. I certainly didn't ask that:

Pretty amusing that you're accusing me of not reading though.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

You're in the wrong fucking thread. Get it together before you go randomly aggro.

You, in the post I originally replied to:

Where does the common definition of ‘Boomer’ say it starts after 1946 (the year Trump was born) and stops with the birth control pill (1960)?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Okay, sorry about that, but you're still wrong because it's anywhere between 1943 and "mid-1946" as per that Wikipedia page.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

We are relatively few in numbers in comparison to the boomers

That's not true. The birth rate dropped slightly from the low 20s per 1000 in the 40s to the mid-60s, then dropped to the high teens in the Gen X era. Relatively few in numbers implies that there were twice as many boomers or something. The reality is that there were about 75 million baby boomers births, and about 65 million Gen X.

Trump is a boomer (1946, same year as Clinton and Bush), Biden is a "silent generation" guy, born before the end of WWII. He's actually the first (and presumably last) Silent Generation president. The ones before him were all boomers or "greatest" generation.

[-] computerscientistII@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

While those facts might not be wrong in your neck of the woods, they are at least very, very US centric. That is of course ok, as we are talking about the US candidates here. But generally, keep in mind that the world is way bigger than the US. You make up a whole of 4% of the world's population. And those numbers all vary from country to country.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The article and the discussion was US-centric. I'm aware things are different outside the US. I don't live in the US. I'm merely pointing out that for an American to think that the baby boom was some kind of massive shift in population that means the number of boomers dwarfs any other generation is wrong.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
766 points (94.8% liked)

News

22838 readers
4172 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS