this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (98.7% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7419 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm guessing the original wearers didn't survive with that many holes in the armour.

[–] PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean if they wanted it to be effective, the Germans shouldn't have designed it with holes in the first place.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It’s no wonder they lost

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Those are speed holes, so they can run faster.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The one on the left looks fine. I see what looks like “splats” from bullets and not actual holes. The middle has a couple holes but they look grazing? The one on the right definitely got shot through.

E: makes me wonder if these were tested rather than the result of an attack?

Left: handgun rounds, Middle: some sort of average rifle or soft bullet? Right: something high powered or specialized bullet like APC.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Top of the image says "body armor test" so the holes are from the tests and not combat. Your edit is most likely correct.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Well, I guess I stated the obvious then. Always helpful to read.