154
The nude female body has been depicted in art countless times. But where is all the pubic hair? (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 2 months ago by Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works to c/andfinally@feddit.uk
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 65 points 2 months ago

You know how Roman statues were actually painted bright colors? In ancient times pubes were actually glued onto the groins of sculpted figures, unfortunately with weathering over time most of these sculptures lost their pubes

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 months ago

Weird, the same thing happened to me

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Your merkin weathered away over time, too?

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

It did, but people dig that now, so evvs

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Not Roman, Greek. The Greek sculptures were painted. Roman sculptors found the Greek marble beautiful without paint, and didn’t paint theirs.

[-] hihi24522@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago

Wikipedia disagrees: Roman Sculpture

Most statues were actually far more lifelike and often brightly colored when originally created; the raw stone surfaces found today is due to the pigment being lost over the centuries.

[-] ColdFenix@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

I think it was the renaissance sculptors that did that, not the romans.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

One of Ceasar's statue was found to have pigment residues. You can find an image of how it would've looked like when it was painted.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
154 points (92.3% liked)

And Finally...

929 readers
142 users here now

A place for odd or quirky world news stories.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Emperor@feddit.uk