-46

Democrats Tuned Out Gaza Protests at the DNC. History Won’t Forget. (truthout.org)

submitted 4 months ago by verdantbanana@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As Vice President Kamala Harris received the presidential nomination at the 2024 Democratic National Convention (DNC), thousands of people marched near the convention demanding an end to U.S. arms shipments to Israel and the war on Gaza. The protesters, led by Palestinian and Jewish activists, represented a diverse coalition including anti-war veterans, climate justice activists, and labor organizers. Despite efforts by Democrats to keep the Palestine issue sidelined, the marchers made their voices heard, declaring Harris and President Joe Biden complicit in the genocide in Gaza. The protesters came from communities and movements that are often considered part of the Democratic coalition, warning that their votes could not be taken for granted unless the party takes concrete action to end the occupation and devastation in Palestine. Organizers estimate around 30,000 people demonstrated in Chicago over the course of the week, making Palestine impossible to ignore during the convention. The activists drew connections between the struggle for Palestinian liberation and the fight against racist violence and state repression in the U.S., challenging the Democratic Party's complicity in both. The protests encountered a heavy police presence, with hundreds of riot police surrounding the march at all times. Despite the tension, the demonstration remained largely peaceful as the protesters demanded justice for Palestine. As Kamala Harris prepared to take the stage, the marchers continued their chants and songs, determined to keep the spotlight on the ongoing catastrophe in Gaza and the Democratic Party's failure to address it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I said roughly the same thing, while pointing out that the OP has pushed anti voting agenda in the past and got my comment removed (I did use the word idiot). ~~The mods are not allowing discourse here.~~

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Meh, it's rule three. You can say that OP's ideas are idiotic, but you can't say OP is an idiot. They are allowing discourse but not ad hominem attacks. It's really a good thing for the level of discourse in a sub.

[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Fair enough. I didn’t call the OP an idiot, but suggested that if they believe not voting will help the Palestinians they were an idiot. But I’ll refrain in the future.

[+] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You also accused OP of being a troll. Which is also not allowed.

Just because someone doesn't agree with you, even if they have a history of that, doesn't make them a troll.

It means they have different opinions than you. And that's ok. You don't have to get personal and accuse people of stuff though.

[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

My comment wasn't based on our differing opinions, but rather the OP's post/comment history. However name calling isn't cool and as I said in a reply a few hours back, I'll refrain from that in the future.

[+] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -8 points 4 months ago

We can see your comment/post history. It is clear that you are either a Russian/Chinese/North Korean/MAGA troll attempting election interference or an idiot who thinks not voting is the solution to all of America’s problems. The argument that not voting will somehow help the Palestinians is mind numbing at best and horrifying at worst. Trump will green light the total destruction on Gaza. I also failed to see anything here about Trump’s phone call preventing a ceasefire. He will pull funding from Ukraine, who also needs help in their struggle against genocide as well. Is it worth the paycheck to spread this bullshit? Or are you really that ignorant? by

@UnpopularCrow

you called me a Russian/Chinese/North Korean/MAGA troll

you labeled me just like cops like to do without having any facts that was why you were banned

you are the one playing out the narrative the elites want the one that divides citizens but bitching and lying about your actions when you are called out just like both parties do especially Trump

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

People are wired to look for patterns in randomness and meaning in irrationality. Something considering the irrationality of your post at the very very very very bottom of all the other posts. Leaves you significantly unqualified to really complain about this.

That said I believe that you are genuine. For all the good that means. In this day and age of generative ai. If paid opposition was ever really that widespread. It isn't today. And while you aren't a magat either. You'd never acknowledge just how much like them you were behaving. I genuinely believe that you're probably a decent person as are most magats. I just wish I could believe that either group might wake up and understand how counterproductive their behavior is. Often hurting the very thing they advocate for. And start to question who that sort of behavior actually helps. Because it isn't either one of the issues either group obsesses over.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The mods are not allowing discourse here.

Check the modlog for what pro-genocide centrists (there will never be another kind of centrist) consider "discourse."

[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Agreed. I was in clear violation of Rule 3. The mods did the right thing as I deserved the delete.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Anyone who checks the modlog can see that you didn't just call them an idiot.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024

-46 points (33.8% liked)

politics

19248 readers

2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News