this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
482 points (97.6% liked)

196

17000 readers
1517 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@sh.itjust.works
482
Leonardo DiCaprirule (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by Clbull@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

16 is under 26

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

This person numbers

[–] user224 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No. I'll prove you wrong:
16
26
(16 above 26)

Checkmate.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Now that's the kind of mathematical thinking that leads to shit like imaginary numbers, [∞(∞)/∞-1] or TREE(3), and let's not forget the Mandelbrot and Julia sets.