703
submitted 3 months ago by Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

If they enter his home, and there is no evidence of a crime, then what is the basis for the arrest?
One thing is to investigate the truth of a call, another is to act on it as if it's verbatim truth.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 70 points 3 months ago

Usually swat teams break a lot of your shit, maybe kill a baby, and then leave without arresting you.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago

Don’t need to arrest the suspect if they’re dead taps forehead

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago

Oh AND leave you with the bill

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Or toss a flash bang in the crib.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 13 points 3 months ago

After breaking down the wrong door

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Was he arrested? I don't see follow up. It only says he was handcuffed which would be standard until they know what's going on.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

In the US, the cops need RAS to handcuff you. The standard was never and is not "until they know what's going on". And RAS depends on the current cop knowledge. Even if they had legal grounds to break into your place, what they see in the next ten seconds is still relevant. For example, if someone said you attacked them with a knife, when the cops see no victim, knife, or blood, their legal authority ceases.

Of course it's all highly dependent on specific details.

(On traffic stops, often they already have RAS. That's why they pulled you over. So don't be fooled by other comments about that topic.)

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"Law enforcement officers typically have fairly broad leeway to place someone in handcuffs during an interaction if they believe that it’s necessary to protect themselves from harm. In those cases, they can do so even if the person being handcuffed hasn’t been arrested."

"When a search warrant is being executed"

https://www.northernillinoislegalteam.com/blog/2021/04/when-do-police-have-the-right-to-handcuff-a-person/

Handcuffs do not mean an arrest.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

This is in Germany, idk what laws in the US have to do with this

[-] freewheel@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It's not technically an arrest. In a high-stakes call, the police will typically detain everybody until they can figure out what's going on. That means potential victims as well as potential attackers. It's a safety measure.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

In the US, the 4th Amendment says that's unconstitutional. Fortunately. Too many dirty pigs out there.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

There was no arrest.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
703 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

48714 readers
1136 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS