this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1125 points (98.5% liked)

News

36270 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Tim Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has called for the electoral college system of electing US presidents to be abolished and replaced with a popular vote principle, as operates in most democracies.

His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters but risk destabilising the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, who has not adopted a position on the matter, despite having previously voiced similar views.

"I think all of us know, the electoral college needs to go," Walz told donors at a gathering at the home of the California governor, Gavin Newsom. "We need a national popular vote. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada, and win."


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why though? We call baking people bakers, why shouldn't we call enlaved people slaves?

It's not as if their circumstances become more human that way.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This very succinctly summarizes what I hate about the "unhoused" brand of pedantry. Pretty sure they want shelter more than some rich college kid making sure everyone on the internet gets their fucking nouns right.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Changing the language you use about a thing changes your perception of that thing. This is data driven reality of making small changes to the way you talk actively changes the thought process on it. You can be lazy and not do it, it's your own language. But that's all your doing. Being lazy, or actively reactionary.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems a lot of people here are against the humanizing of enslaved people's. Weird.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think people just find you annoying more than anything specific to what you're saying, but that's just a guess.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

True, and that's a failing on them. Real baby shit

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I called baked people high

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's just good to reinforce the idea that enslaved people's were people who were enslaved. Not a profession, slave was not their job, it was their status.

Plus studies have shown that by using these people first language, especially while teaching the subject, results in higher empathy for enslaved people and reminds that their status as a slave was one forced upon them and continually so rather than the simple status they were born with.

It's not a huge problem or anything, but it isn't hard to toss in every now and then and only does good.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Good" like derailing conversations that were about content and making them about semantics. "Good".

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

God forbid someone on a thread based system bring up a related topic on the side. Like, is that really your complaint? Oh no guys, the humanization of enslaved people's is derailing this 3rd person's quip. Quick, we must stop him!

Silly billy you are.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Idk why but the apostrophe is bugging me. Enslaved peoples.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think there’s a difference between the two. The term “salve” says nothing about what happened. It just tells you how things are. However, the term “enslaved” clearly indicates that the person used to be free, but was later forced into slavery by someone.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Words have a definition, slave is the appropriate word to talk about enslaved people and them being enslaved is what makes them slaves therefore it's implied that they are enslaved if they are slaves. Now stop with the PC bullshit to derail the discussion.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Derail a thread with a small side suggestion. That's a lot of pushback to a small request. Almost like you actively wish to not have enslaved people humanized in conversation.

You can always just not say it yourself. To actively try and start fights about it implies malice.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Imo it's more that "enslaved people" emphasizes their humanity, something that slavery itself typically removes from a person. Therefore "enslaved person" can be seen as radical phrasing that works against the goals of slavery