this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
696 points (99.3% liked)

News

36270 readers
4628 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please stop making up definitions for words that already have them.

You first make the above condescending statement, then immediately follow it up by describing right-libertarianism, thus making up a definition for a word that already has that description.

Modern neoliberals are not so extreme as to advocate for the total abolishment of fundamental social safety nets as you suggest. Instead, they are much more diabolical. They pretend to support such programs just enough to attract the socially progressive vote. They frequently hold a platform of "reforming" such programs to lower their costs. Once elected, the modern neoliberal gently strangles those programs to allow them to lower corporate taxes or provide benefits to the business class in exchange for their financial support. Some examples of modern American neoliberals are Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

So how 'bout you stop making up definitions for words that already have them? We don't have to debate fucking minutia and semantics at the expense of destroying our actual common enemies. Instead of being condescending to one another, why don't we try working together for a fucking change? I can see why the French started killing each other when they ran out of elites. I am fucking bloodthirsty right now and arguing stupid shit with people on my own team is a waste of both of our resources.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. Just no.

They share a couple goals. They are not the same thing. And if you want to describe Neo Liberalism so broadly as to mean all American politicians who aren't Socialist then you're just spreading misinformation at that point. Usually this is some stupid take from tankies.

Go look it up. Because Maggoty class time is over. I've spent enough time today on this already.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Go look it up.

Okay. Below are some links to sources to support my characterization of neoliberalism and my specific assertion that Clinton and Reagan are thought of as neoliberals in modern American politics.

Now, can you provide any evidence of your assertion that

"Neo liberal refers specifically to the deregulation of the market, abolishing the income tax, and getting rid of social welfare programs like SSI and Medicare"?

Because I looked it up like you suggested, and I'm not seeing any evidence to support your claim.

Looks like maybe class is still in session for Maggoty. Please feel free to educate me. I may not be very smart, but I am curious and open to learn some of that Maggoty nuance you like to try to bully people with.

REAGAN AND NEOLIBERALISM

What is neoliberalism? A political scientist explains the use and evolution of the term

Neoliberalism from Reagan to Clinton

Ronald Reagan Was a Proud Neoliberal

First-wave neoliberalism in the 1980s: Reaganomics and Thatcherism

BILL CLINTON WAS A NEOLIBERAL

How Bill Clinton Became a Neoliberal

Bill Clinton Did More to Sell Neoliberalism than Milton Friedman

How the Third Way Made Neoliberal Politics Seem Inevitable

MODERN DEMOCRAT PARTY IS HIGHLY NEOLIBERAL

Democrats and Neoliberalism

How the Democrats Traded the New Deal for Neoliberalism

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And not a goddamn .edu among them. Thank you for illustrating the problem. It's literally available for free. Have fun reading, they have one about normal liberals too.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link. Your own source absolutely destroys your case for you. Below is an excerpt. Notice how it is precisely the opposite of your description of neoliberalism.

Neoliberals support modest taxation, the redistribution of wealth, the provision of public goods, and the implementation of social insurance, embracing a state somewhat more expansive than one where government protects people from foreign powers and domestic criminals, produces public goods, and provides limited services for the poor.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know we can all read that in context through the link right?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes! That's the best part about all of this! The entire paper paints you as a liar.

Why are you so hell-bent on creating wedges within the left on Lemmy? It's very weird.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sure thing buddy.