327
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

You know what's really stupid?

Every American who has private insurance right now, could pay that exact same amount instead to the federal government and let it pay our medical bills, and it would result in more people getting care and less cost for the healthcare industry.

Of course, for some reason, some people are strongly opposed to the destruction of a multi-billion-dollar rent-seeking middleman industry and also opposed to healthcare going to certain, shall we say, melaninistically-blessed Americans.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Mine costs my employer and myself $15,000 yearly. Colorado marketplace insurance for a "silver" plan (probably very expensive to actually use) is over $8k.

If we all just pooled that money it'd make Medicare for All a reality.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Could a citizen created "Robin Hood" health insurance company incorporate and steal all their lunch?

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I think we need the power of the state behind it.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That would be nice, but I can't see lobbyist allowing it. It state power really essential?

Maybe s co-operative insurance company could fit inside the current framework without legislative change.

(Obviously, I'm just spitballing here)

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it could fit in the current framework so I guess state power isn't essential for creating it. State power is definitely essential to do things like negotiate drug pricing like Medicare does. We saw the power of that recently.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The state certainly brings volume and that is leveraged for negotiations. There's no way a new insurer could have that market share instantly.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Every American who has private insurance right now, could pay that exact same amount instead to the federal government and let it pay our medical bills

Probably pay less and get more access to a wider range of medical services.

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every American who has private insurance right now, could pay that exact same amount instead to the federal government and let it pay our medical bills

That's called a single-payer healthcare system, and it's a good idea. The government can negotiate pricing for the entire country, rather than having a lot of smaller insurance companies that are all in it to make a profit.

Australia has a hybrid public/private system where everyone has public health care (so you can see a doctor and get treated even if you don't have any money), but you can choose to get private insurance if you want to. It's a decent idea.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
327 points (99.1% liked)

News

23659 readers
2908 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS