184
submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whithom@discuss.online 11 points 1 month ago

You’re half right. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen at all. Personally I think, one person, one house—that’s it. Corporations can’t own SFH. Taxed on empty units, taxed on high rates.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

yup tax on empty units in general would help a lot including rent prices, if you want to not pay the extra tax, better lower your rent to a point people can afford. So the tax needs to be high enough for this decision to be made.

[-] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Personally I think, one person, one house

What's a family to do?

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I'm guessing they mean maximum one person one house, so a person can't own two houses but many people can choose to live in one house.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago

Obviously you have a house for your baby 🙄

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
184 points (92.2% liked)

Socialism

5265 readers
29 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS