95
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
190 readers
556 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
imagine linking a goat headed, muscular titted up, black winged, cool af, demon and portraying your enemy as them and thinking you owned them
communist skeleton propaganda hours
I don’t think these losers realize how dope Baphomet is.
Legit so dope in persona 5
Which ones are the routine infant circumcision guys? I forget...
Edit: On that's right, America is the one who sacrifices approximately 100 infants each year at the altar of Actually, The Good Form Of Child Mutilation™ to the gods of "I want my kid's penis to look like mine" and "Skin is mega yucky and who can actually keep that stuff clean via hygiene practices anyway? Best to just remove it"
Important, medically necessary gender affirming healthcare for all people, cis or trans, though. That's evil and dastardly. That kid with gynaecomastia needs to be denied the opportunity for surgical interventions because they should grow up knowing immense suffering and humiliation because, apparently, that's what you do when your primary concern is the wellbeing of children.
If they can, they'll carve out exemptions for cis people and their preferred child mutilation. Cis people will not be effected unless they have to be.
They're probably just waiting for their big Ryan White moment to present itself, you're right, but at the moment it appears that everyone is being thrown under the legislative bus wholesale.
On the other hand, trans people and disabled people are sorta the canaries in the coalmine for these regressive values and policies but it never stops with the first marginalised group to be targeted because it inevitably expands to the next one and then the one following that; when bathroom hysteria started entering the mainstream there were more than a few prominent examples of butch lesbians and cis women who didn't fit the mold of societal standards for femininity being harassed and thrown out of bathrooms, including by the pigs. I imagine those incidents would only be trending upwards nowadays. Seems like the lack of any general outrage at these incidents which, ironically, make bathrooms far more unsafe than the supposed "safety risks" they are trying to prevent points to the fact that a lot of people are really comfortable with brutally strict gender policing and that leads me to think that trans people are the first in line but there's a whole queue of other groups that are going to be next.
I don't know enough to feel certain about all this but either way it's still completely fucked.
I'm not able to get on my computer or I'd be able to look up information, sorry. I thought most legislation was just targeting trans people, where possible? Like puberty blockers, for the purpose of transition. Right now This Tennessee law is in the Supreme Court. This only targets trans people. There are many similar laws in other states. Now, if they can't just target trans people, they might just ban puberty blockers wholesale, but that isn't what they're trying to do.
But that wasn't from the legislative bus, there's no laws preventing butch women from using the bathroom. It's only trans people targeted by those laws, even if cis people got accidentally punished.
{
:chiitan-angel: |
}
Absolute banger