682
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by ChaosCoati@midwest.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

TLDR: The insurance company has a new policy, set to take effect in February 2025, where they decide how much anesthesia is needed for surgeries. They won’t pay for any anesthesia over that, with exemptions for maternity and pediatric cases and for Connecticut providers.

The article also notes the insurance company reported a $2.3 billion net income increase in June 2024.

Edit to update: Anthem now says they won’t put this policy into effect

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 166 points 3 weeks ago

Biden could pardon the assassin...

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 3 weeks ago

Someone should start a petition

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago

https://www.change.org/

Was thinking about it. Even if it's not taken seriously and even if it never gets Joe Biden signature, this would be a real good way to send a message to the nation. Just how many people the absolute number of people who are angry to the point of letting people kill CEO's Because of injustice and inequality.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago

He would have to be known. I would rather the guy stay anon so his life isn't ruined. He can live the rest of his life without the fear of corpo vengeance. Also he probably would never be able to be insured again lol. Either that or he's terminal and his care was denied so he had nothing to lose.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 51 points 3 weeks ago

I got diagnosed with stage 3 cancer in 2022 (cured now). I can totally see how someone could go full The Punisher on healthcare execs if their life-saving treatment was denied. The problem isn't facing your own mortality, that doesn't take long to process. What is an impossible pill to swallow is the thought of leaving your loved ones drowned in an avalanche of medical debt and possible financial ruin. Fuck that.

Deny
Depose
Defend

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago

Pardons don't have to be specific, they've been used to pardon whole groups of people before (although it's properly called an amnesty, in that case) https://www.justsecurity.org/73851/the-constitutionality-of-non-specific-pardons/

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

John Kramer, is that you?

[-] 0p3r470r@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago

Doubtful. It’s probably a state crime.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Symbolic, doesn't matter really.

It's about sending a message

[-] 0p3r470r@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

How would Biden pardon him? Is there a federal crime here?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

And include future CEO-targeting crimes.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
682 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12566 readers
783 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS