132

Summary

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy faced sharp criticism during a House Oversight Committee hearing over USPS delivery issues, financial troubles, and his leadership.

Rep. Rich McCormick mocked DeJoy for covering his ears during heated exchanges, accusing him of bankrupting the postal system and undermining public trust.

DeJoy defended his performance, citing ongoing efforts to overhaul USPS through a $40 billion plan, including electric vehicles, but admitted regrets and challenges.

Tensions reflect broader frustrations over USPS reforms and the agency’s financial sustainability amid mixed results.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

Biden isn't a king. Postmaster General is elected by the Board of Governors, which Biden did replace a number of. Also no more than half of them can be from the same party, so gridlock is natural.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

As you said, Biden replaced members of the board of governors. They are an odd number, and the majority were appointed by Biden.

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/people/2022/05/usps-board-is-now-mostly-biden-picks-following-latest-senate-confirmations/

There’s really no reason for DeJoy to still be around.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

Agreed, but it's out of Biden's hands now, I don't like popularizing a unitary executive

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

And the dog ate his homework and the sun was in his eyes.

He isn't running for anything ever again. You don't have to make excuses for him anymore.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not making excuses for him, I'm discouraging an inaccurate conception of the division of powers. I'm fine blaming him for all the things that are his fault, but I don't think reinforcing the idea that "the president is a king who has total authoritarian control over the federal government" helps anyone except the people who want to make that a reality. He appointed what he could to the Board, direct your ire, in this instance, at them.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

He chose who he put on the board.

He chose poorly.

Just like he chose poorly with Merrick Garland. Dave it, Biden made a lot of fuck ups. Both of this likely helped cost them the election. We saw there were misdelivered, filled in ballots. DeJoy had a hand in that, guaranteed.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Just like he chose poorly with Merrick Garland

He chose Garland to do the function Garland performed: dragging his feet so Democrats could run against Trump again.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

So the same mistake Hilary made when she got her media contacts to talk about him non-stop.

Democrats are not learning from their mistakes

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'm starting to think they have and this wasn't a mistake.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I’m fine blaming him for all the things that are his fault

Name one.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago

Ok. Now try something he didn't do that he could have. Or do you honestly believe he did everything he could?

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Or do you honestly believe he did everything he could?

In general? Definitely not. In this specific case? Yeah, probably. It's not normal for appointees to be sycophant drones, and in terms of concentration of power it's not even desirable. Concentrating total power in the President is not a good idea, and advocating it by blaming the President for things that fall outside the scope of their power only empowers the people who want a dictator.

He made his appointments to the Board. The decisions those Board members make are on them, if you have a problem with their decisions, criticize them directly and direct your correspondence to them. Concentrating every complaint on the President promotes an inaccurate, and therefore ineffective, conception of scope of responsibility.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

When trump fires DeJoy, remember this comment.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Now, now. According to centrists who aren't pro-genocide at all (no siree) he just had to keep selling weapons that he knew were being used to commit an ongoing genocide because they had been approved already, and the Leahy Law doesn't apply for some reason.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Yes, biden didn't do anything. He chooses to work within a system where his only option is serving the slave masters' system.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

Biden should have seized absolute power and instituted authoritarian communism for the good of the people.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah... He should remain a powerless dummy who's only legacy is avidly promoting genocide.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

"Totally legal executive action"

Bingo!

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
132 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19198 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS