77
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
291 readers
413 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
Sure. First, image op makes a spurious claim about PSL use of funds, moving on without explaining where/why/how national elections is simply "a way for PSL to move money to the consultant class".
Then they admit their math is "far from perfect", but forge ahead anyway with the frankly ridiculous idea that the ratio of dollars to votes would somehow continue to hold true at scale.
The post does not say that. The post is talking about USAmerican elections in general being a way to move money to a consultant class.
Which consultants took PSL money? Can you name the firms or people that were paid? Or are you referring to printing costs or costs of running online ads?
Ask the person who the OP is about. I was merely correcting a misunderstanding.