RedWizard

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/58004

World Cup Workers Strike in Seattle -- UAW Divests from Israel Bonds -- Minnesota Indictment Raises Signal Questions

Folks,

Greetings from the Burgh, where Payday is finding some fundraising success and very grateful to everyone who donated in the last few days. It took a lot of pressure off of us and gave us some breathing room.

Donate to Help Us Build a Sustainable Funding Model

We got a lot of exciting stuff planned. Partnerships with local immigration rights groups, a veteran union organizer coming on board to help with fundraising, and media trainings for community groups.

(See our 5-page media and newsletter building training curriculum)

For the last three years, we relied heavily on foundation money for a large part of our budget.  We are working to build a sustainable model that won’t be hurt if a major foundation leaves us like we suffered this year. So please give money if you can and help us build because we are entering a new era of Payday Report.

Donate Now

Seattle Hotel Workers Strike as World Cup Visitors Arrive

Last week, Payday Report released an interactive map showing how unions are fighting back against ICE raids. (Check out our map about this growing trend across the country)

At the Embassy Suites in Seattle across the street from Lumin Field, where World Cup games are being played, UNITE HERE members decided to go on strike. They are striking around, both having their hours cut and the refusal of their hotel to refuse entry to ICE.

“Hotel workers who are welcoming visitors from around the world to Seattle shouldn’t have to work second and third jobs to support their families or worry about whether they will have healthcare over the slow months in winter,” said UNITE HERE Local 8 President Anita Seth. “And, as a majority immigrant workforce, they deserve the peace of mind of notification from their employer if ICE or DHS is on property.”

For more, check out our friends at The Stand.

Feds Likely to Indict More Labor Leaders in Minnesota

Earlier this week, the Trump Administration announced that they were indicting 15 activists, including labor leaders, on a variety of charges. Many labor leaders suspected that the 15 were charged so that the prosecutors could gain access to their signal chats.

Now, a new expose from The Intercept shows that ICE was able to obtain messages from Signal that many previously thought were encrypted and protected. From the Intercept:

The bulk of the indictment consists of transcripts of group messages; at various points it also makes mention of voicemails, text messages, Signal direct messages, and Signal calls. For instance, the indictment in one spot mentions that two of the indictees “exchanged approximately 20 connected Signal calls.” This hints that authorities were able to access not just group chat messages, but likely had wholesale access to the devices of at least some of those indicted.

The Signal app provides end-to-end encryption, protecting communications in transit, so that anyone monitoring your internet or cellular data connection cannot see the contents of your messages. Signal also minimizes the amount of metadata collected, so if the organization behind the app, the Signal Foundation, was served with a compulsory legal process to reveal user information, it wouldn’t even know with whom you spoke or chatted.

But all that falls apart if your device gets into the wrong hands. In order to safeguard your Signal data from someone who obtains access to your device, it’s necessary to manually harden Signal by modifying some of its default settings.

Perhaps Signal’s most well-touted security and privacy feature is its ability to set disappearing messages. Messages can be set to expire in periods ranging from seconds to weeks. A default expiration time for all messages can be selected, and specific groups and conversations can be set to custom retention times. To minimize risk, set retention times to the shortest feasible duration — minutes or hours — rather than days or weeks.

For more safety tips, check out the Intercept.

UAW Votes to Divest from Israel Bonds

At the UAW’s convention this weekend, they voted to become the largest union to date to divest from Israel Bonds. The UAW owned approximately $400,000 worth of Israeli bonds.

"It felt so overwhelming and amazing, but it also was so reaffirming that the United Auto Workers is actually a union that stands for progressive, militant, rank-and-file action and protecting the most vulnerable among us," Olga Karounos, 33, a public defender in Brooklyn, New York, from  UAW Local 3235, who sponsored the resolution, told the Detroit News.

Karounous’ family is Greek Orthodox, and she said that the Israeli attack on Church of Saint Porphyrius in Gaza City in 2023 had a strong effect on her, deepening her commitment to divest her union from Israeli bonds.

"We vote with our dollars, and we just voted not to support our dollars going to genocide,” Karounus told the Detroit News.

For more, check out the Detroit News.

Amazon Workers Under Investigation for Speaking about Data Centers

Finally, Wired has a look at how three Amazon workers say they are under investigation for speaking out about data centers:

Earlier this month, five current Amazon employees publicly urged Seattle City Council to regulate data centers. It was an unprecedented act of advocacy by tech workers, and now, three of the staffers say they are now under internal investigation for what they understand to be allegedly representing themselves as spokespeople for the company without prior approval. “It’s a totally ridiculous claim,” says one of the affected employees, Patrick Schloesser. “It’s patently absurd.”

The three software engineers, who work in different divisions of Amazon and all live in Seattle, believe they are being unfairly targeted for expressing their political beliefs. They filed a joint complaint on Thursday to Seattle’s Office for Civil Rights, according to the employees and a filing seen by WIRED. They accused Amazon of illegally attempting to intimidate and retaliate against them for expressing their personal opinion outside of work about the need to regulate the environmental and social impacts of data centers.

“Seattle is one of just a few jurisdictions in the country that prohibits private employers from discriminating against their employees based on the political beliefs they hold and the organizations they belong to,” says Abby Lawlor, an attorney at Barnard Iglitzin & Lavitt who is advising the employees. “Here, we have legal tools to fight back and ensure that tech workers can be full democratic participants in these important local discussions. We hope the city of Seattle will do its part to ensure that this vital Seattle law is enforced.”

For more, check out WIRED.

News & Headlines Elsewhere

Alright folks, that’s all for today. Keep sending tips, comments, and complaints to melk@paydayreport.com

Donate to Help Us Cover Labor in News Deserts


From Payday Report via This RSS Feed.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 22 points 20 hours ago

Fuck Dick Blumenthal.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 10 points 20 hours ago

Absolute Chimpema :Kelly:

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago

That's taking me back!

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

This probably means that if you've sent $600+ back and forth between friends for any number of reasons using something like CashApp, you'll also need to fill out these forms.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's very clear there is an arm of the Democratic Party using the DSA as a means of appealing to the alternative voter. The voter who doesn't enjoy the current formation of the Democrats, but is still registered as a Democrat. It's a working strategy right now. You pluck the most capable DSA member out of flock, dress them up, and send them out hat in hand. The PSL's assessment, that this represents a shift in peoples desire for "socialism" does ring true, it's obvious that people are looking for "something different". I think it's also clear that what voters desire is exactly what the DSA and the Democrats are offering, which is strictly Social Democracy + "acceptable" levels of national chauvinism. I think in order for a desire for something more than strictly the Democrats, you need to have some kind of crisis of self, and a loss of faith in these institutions. In a way that sours the Democratic Party for you altogether.

The real linchpin here is the primary process, right? In DC, it is a closed primary, which means that only registered Democrats can vote in that primary. I think it's interesting that most of these high profile DSA primaries happen in places where closed primaries are the requirement. It varies state to state, but in DC and NYC the primaries are closed. This means that, you have to stay a registered Democrat in order to have a voice in the primary process. These primaries obviously precede the actual race. In many cases, they're more of a spectacle than the race itself. This is because, the tension isn't between Democrats and Republicans in the country anymore, it's between Democrats and a growing progressive base of voters. The growing progressive base isn't going to be interested in voting for Republicans. In Democratic strongholds, the fight is no longer one where the battle lines are drawn between Republican and Democratic policy, but between liberal and progressive policy. The goal is to not lose people to these populist ideals like they did during Trumps last election run. They need to capture them somehow, and what better way to do it, then to have the battle internally first, instead of externally between two parties. You ultimately have more control over that environment.

This tactic then, forces disillusioned registered Democratic voters to come back to the table, and gives them a sense that they're making a choice that pushes things forward. It gives them what they want, which is this feeling of progress, change, and voting for an "outsider", but it does it at the primary level, before the actual race. If this new progressive wins, they will then be folded into the Democratic Party machine, forcing them to become the "insider". This is good for Democrats, because it means that Democrats are still getting votes, and these "progressives" can help clean their tarnished image. However, as we've seen, these candidates often do not engage with the base of support they built during their primary once it's over. They not only become molded by the liberal mayorship they inherit, but also become molded by the Democratic Party itself. An independent of say, a principled Workers Party, would have similar limitations, except that they have the ability to agitate against the Democratic establishment while doing so. They would not need to mold their shape to whatever Democratic Party operatives need them to. This presents another problem, however.

Say you're operating a workers party under these conditions, and have a member who you want to present as a challenger against these DSA candidates. In these localities, these primaries can have almost 12 months worth of build up in the media. The NYC Democratic primary, obviously incredibly high profile, was in the news for almost that long before the primary had happened. That's a lot of air time that your candidate is not getting, because they're not in the primary. I think Democrats must understand this, and it is part of why we've seen these candidates enter these specific primaries. It lessens the risk that a true progressive third party option enters the fray and has a chance in the race. However, it's also true this relationship cuts both ways. I've seen the argument being made time and again that the progressive in roads all start with the Democratic Party and the primary process. So, these candidates seek out these primary positions as what they believe to be the only "viable" option towards progress. What is interesting though, is that it doesn't appear that in Zoran's case or Lewis George's case that there were any challenges to their admission to the ballot. If these candidates really represented a kind of challenge to Democrats as they seem to position themselves as, it stands to reason that Democrats would use whatever legal authority available to attempt to remove them from the primary process. This would include things like challenging the candidates petition signatures in court, which is not an unusual thing to do.

I think what this shows us is that these DSA candidates represent a kind of compatible formation. If they were incompatible, and represented a threat to the norms of the party, we would see more material pushback from the party itself. Instead, they are embraced, and while Zoran undoubtably dealt with unrelenting attack ads during his mayoral campaign and the primary, eventually the party folded when it was clear he had won. Contrast this with the 2024 election, where in Pennsylvania and Georgia, the PSL was removed from ballot access by Democratic challenges. In fact, you can even see how these systems of registration requirements can passively work against these third party options. Take Pennsylvania for example, where two Democratic-aligned challenges were filed. A Commonwealth Court judge ruled the PSL's paperwork was "fatally flawed" because seven of their 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats who had voted in that year's primary, violating state law. The PSL was removed from the ballot. Laws like this serve to prevent things like "Party Raiding", but they also reinforce the two party system by making it arbitrarily complicated for third parties to establish themselves.

In places like California where they have their "Jungle" primary system, you're probably more likely to stand a chance, since that process is used to pick the two candidates that'll appear on the ballots for given positions. A process where, in the race for governor, the PSL placed 10th in the recent primaries in the state, out of I think 60 candidates.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

This post is two years old, and the URL that provides the context for the discussion is dead. What are we even supposed to look at here?

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57691

The 14-point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding, which US officials detailed to reporters on Wednesday, says that under the potential deal, Iran’s enriched uranium will be downblended “on site,” as the US has backed off on its demand to take it out of the country. The MoU states that the “have agreed to resolve the disposition […]


From News From Antiwar.com via This RSS Feed.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Do you have access to a projector and some big ass speakers? You could project some stuff on the building that night.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Ain't that the truth.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (12 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Finally, a thread JUST FOR ME!

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Non-Compete and Luna Oi! Are high on my list, as well as Second Thought. I have very little room in my life for three hour podcasts, but I do make time for Blowback.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57403

The Senate on Tuesday failed to advance a War Powers Resolution that would direct President Trump to end hostilities against Iran that haven’t been authorized by Congress and prevent the president from restarting the full-scale war against the Islamic Republic. A motion to discharge the resolution out of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee failed on […]


From News From Antiwar.com via This RSS Feed.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57280

When ByHeart infant formula was linked to a nationwide outbreak of infant botulism last fall, the company encouraged its customers to switch to another premium whole milk formula made by Nara Organics. Now Nara Organics, which has promoted the “thousands of tests” it runs on every formula batch, is recalling all of its whole milk organic powdered infant formula after the Centers for Disease…

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57328

men's and women's bathroom signs

Photo by Juan Marin on Unsplash

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.

Today, U.S. District Court Judge Amanda K. Brailsford, a Biden appointee, issued a 30-page ruling granting a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Idaho's H.B. 752, the felony bathroom ban—but it contains a major caveat: enforcement is only blocked when a single-user restroom is not available on the same floor. The law, set to take effect July 1, criminalizes transgender people for using restrooms consistent with their gender identity in both government buildings and private businesses, making it the most extreme bathroom ban in the nation. A first offense is a misdemeanor carrying up to a year in jail; a second offense is a felony carrying up to five years in prison; and under Idaho's persistent violator statute, a fourth offense could carry life. The court found the law unconstitutionally vague, with no adequate standards for law enforcement to determine when or how to enforce it. Yet the ruling falls far short of fully protecting transgender Idahoans, and could result in the arrest of trans people who are unaware that they must check for single-user restrooms before entering a multi-user facility consistent with their gender identity.

"The Court enjoins enforcement of H.B. 752 as against all transgender people who seek to use a restroom in a government-owned building or place of public accommodation in Idaho consistent with their gender identity wherever: (1) the covered restroom designated for use by sex is a single-user facility; or (2) when a single-user restroom is not available because no single-user restroom exists on the same floor as the multi-user facilities or all single-user restrooms on the same floor as the multi-user facilities are occupied or not in service," reads the ruling.

In practice, this means the law is only blocked when no single-user option exists—creating a regime in which transgender people must use single-user facilities whenever one is available on the same floor, or face potential criminal charges for using the multi-user restroom that matches their gender identity. Hospitals often have multi-user and single-user restrooms on the same floor. The same is true of airports. It applies at universities, shopping malls, convention centers, and large retail stores that have added family restrooms, and at any government building or private business that has upgraded its facilities to include a single-user option. The bitter irony is that single-user restrooms were added to many of these buildings specifically to be more inclusive of TGNC people—and under this ruling, those very restrooms become the mechanism by which trans people are segregated from everyone else.

The ruling has been widely reported as a clear victory for transgender rights, with Lambda Legal's headline declaring "Judge Blocks Idaho Law Criminalizing Transgender People's Bathroom Access" and the ACLU of Idaho stating that "trans folks in Idaho can continue participating in public life without the threat of being arrested for using the bathroom," an obviously incorrect statement given enforcement is still very possible if a single-use bathroom is available. The national ACLU posted on social media that "a federal judge temporarily blocked a bathroom ban in Idaho" and called it "a win for trans rights." None of these statements mention the single-user limitation. Bloomberg Law reported that the judge "blocked enforcement" of the ban. A transgender person in Idaho reading this coverage could reasonably believe the law has been fully blocked—and could face criminal charges for acting on that belief.

It is notable that the law was indeed partially blocked, and the ruling will still protect transgender people's ability to use restrooms consistent with their gender identity in many common situations—such as in buildings where no single-user facility exists on the same floor, which in practice covers most gas stations, restaurants, and smaller businesses across Idaho. The court found H.B. 752 unconstitutionally vague, ruling that its exceptions for "reasonably available" restrooms and "dire need" provide no objective standards for enforcement. Idaho's own law enforcement agreed—the Idaho Chiefs of Police Association testified that "this proposal presents significant practical enforcement challenges for law enforcement offices in the field… it is unclear how an officer responding to a call would reasonably determine whether someone was truly in 'dire need,' creating an unenforceable standard that places officers in a difficult position." When pressed on how officers would determine a person's biological sex, the state suggested during oral argument that law enforcement could use DNA testing, which was unacceptable to the court.

When asked by The Advocate about the limited relief, Kell Olson from Lambda Legal acknowledged the limitations. See the update from Christopher Wiggins at The Advocate:

“Olson told The Advocate that the narrower relief reflects the preliminary stage of the litigation rather than the full scope of the challenge. “The lawsuit asks for the law to be blocked as to all restrooms, period,” Olson said. “The preliminary relief is slightly narrower.” He said attorneys sought immediate protection in situations where transgender people otherwise would have no practical alternative. “If you do not have a gender neutral option that is available nearby, then you can access the restroom consistent with your gender identity,” Olson said. “That was our main concern: to make sure that people had a ready and safe option anywhere they found themselves.”

Olson acknowledged that some enforcement scenarios remain possible while the case proceeds. “Technically, there will still be the ability for enforcement,” he said, pointing to locker rooms and situations where a gender-neutral option is immediately available. But he said the ruling removes enforcement in a substantial number of circumstances and ensures transgender people have a restroom option throughout the state.”

There are mechanisms by which the scope of relief could be expanded. The plaintiffs can file a motion to clarify or broaden the injunction, and the court reserved the equal protection and informational privacy claims for the merits stage—where a ruling on those grounds could block the entire law without the single-user limitation. The case will almost certainly be appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where the precedent on transgender bathroom access is mixed. H.B. 752 was set to take effect July 1; it will now go into effect with the injunction in place, meaning the law is on the books but partially blocked with these important limitations while the legal fight continues.

EITM reached out to ACLU, and ACLU Idaho but did not receive a response by the time of this publication.

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.


From Erin In The Morning via This RSS Feed.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57347

No individual should be allowed to accumulate a billion dollars worth of wealth, much less a trillion. That wealth is created by working people, and it is our right to put that wealth under the democratic control of working people.


From Liberation News – The Newspaper of the Party for Socialism and Liberation via This RSS Feed.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57363

Federal prosecutors announced charges against 15 protesters in Minnesota on Tuesday, accusing them of “conspiring to interfere with law enforcement” during Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) surge in Minnesota earlier this year. On Tuesday morning, Homeland Security officials raided and arrested 12 of the 15 individuals. One was already in custody; two remain at large.

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/57303

Howdy folks!

I've been reflecting on the spread of content found in !pravda_news@news.abolish.capital and did a little investigating. I had a feeling that there were some British publications that were highly represented in the feed, but wanted to confirm if that was really true. Here are my findings:

| Source | Share of pravda_news | Rank | |


|


|


|

| thecanary.co | 18.4% | #1 (dominant) | | morningstaronline.co.uk | 4.6% | #5 | | novaramedia.com | 2.2% | #13 | | Total Share of British Sources | 25.2% | - |

25% of the feed, is quite a lot. It doesn't help as well that morningstaronline.co.uk has sports coverage that I've tried to filter out of the feed. Sadly, the RSS they provide does not tag their posts in any way. This means I would need to perform some kind of look up on that specific publication for sports related keywords and bounce the post, which is going to be very prone to error and false positives.

A new community focused on Great Britain.

So, I've decided to move these publications into a new community !Britain@news.abolish.capital. Which will house them going forward. If you want leftist news about Britain, you can find it there. This also allows for more British publications to be added to the site without feeling like I'm contributing more Britain focused content into an already British skewed feed. At the time of this posting, there are about 15 stories in the queue, once those have run their course, you'll see the publications in the table above begin posting in this new community.

My goal for pravda_news has always been one to highlight world news, and that can be a struggle depending on available sources, and those sources rate of posting. theconnary.co Is a good example. This brings me to another idea that I've had in my head for a while now.

Cross posting from communities (idea)

This isn't implemented yet, but it could be easy to do. The idea is simple. In the other communities, top stories (of a given time-span, undecided at this moment) would be cross-posted into !pravda_news@news.abolish.capital. This would effectively act as a community filter, taking what people found upvote worthy over the last X hours in other communities, and automatically cross-posting those stories into !pravda_news@news.abolish.capital.

This would allow the site to have these siloed communities with focused themes, but still serve that content into the larger, more populated feed. Hopefully in turn it encourages people to join those other feeds.

No timeline on this feature currently. But would be interested in hearing people's thoughts.

Reflecting

I hope this content has been useful to you in some way. I'm always surprised to see how many people engage with the feeds provided here! There is a great diversity of participation from across the network, which is encouraging! It feels like this site has been in operation for much longer, but we've only been up for the last 8 months. So much has happened in that 8 months time as well, and these feeds have chronicled a lot of it.

Thanks for reading!

 

There is just a trove of comments here, I was going to pick out the best, but honestly, there's something in here for everyone.

Ok here is the obvious stand-out:

Also, user KamalaHarrisWaifu has a lot of "takes" in the thread.

I actually have no idea to what extent the cost of Deepseek (or other Chinese models) are subsidized. One thing is true though, the grid these things exist on in China is owned by the state, and not privately owned, which I'm sure changes the calculus. (Not to mention the sheer capacity of said grid being off the charts).

view more: next ›