this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
477 points (99.0% liked)

Uplifting News

15038 readers
2014 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

obviously it's new and recent research, but holy heck

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Scientists of Lemmy, tell me why this is BS

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 3 months ago

besides working in mice only being a "probably works in humans": it's very recent and is a research paper. only facts that hold true by the time they're included in a review paper are considered certain. maybe instead of viable mice, they measured a vial of meth. however, because this is published in an accredited journal, any mistake would probably be much more subtle than that, and having many co-authors lowers the odds even further. of anything wrong that affects the conclusion, i mean. meth is overrated

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We are in the worst timeline and can't have nice things.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 3 months ago

My first thought was wondering whether there exists a special variety of big tiddy lab mice bred solely for use in breast cancer research

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From the sidebar:

This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today’s news cycle

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I don’t think questioning a science story is the negativity that comes from today’s news cycle.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't they just shutdown all NIH and cancer research ostensibly eliminating the department completely?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Humans don't have mouse titties.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Because my momma said its the devils work!

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mice are not human, drug prob won't work the same way in humans. IANAS

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They used human tumors in mice so it was being tested against human tumors. The main issue is that the mice were immunocompromised so it would stand to be tested in humans with functional immune systems.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

OK but its nice knowing we can help mice tho

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

"Single dose" and "no side effects" makes me very sceptical.