this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
655 points (93.4% liked)

Political Memes

6112 readers
3907 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] M1nds3nd@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

A fantasy apparently.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I define it as one where everyone is equal and free. opinions may vary though.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How can you have a society where everyone is equal and free if you don't define the right of individuals to be equal and free? There are always people and organizations who would give preference to their tribe, whether for well-intentioned or nefarious reasons.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are always people and organizations who would give preference to their tribe, whether for well-intentioned or nefarious reasons.

you can't prove this

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Has there ever been anywhere in recorded human history where this wasn't true?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 weeks ago

this question is not proof.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How can you have a society where everyone is equal and free if you don't define the right of individuals to be equal and free

it seems pretty obvious that we can just observe whether everybody is equal and free, and if somebody is preventing somebody else from being equal or free, tell them to knock it off.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and if somebody is preventing somebody else from being equal or free, tell them to knock it off.

That's what rights are.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no, "rights" are an enlightenment era fiction created by people who were supposedly interested in empiricism, but never bothered to question whether rights exist.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rights are things that as a society we agree people should be allowed to do. And if they're prevented from doing them, we tell the people preventing them to knock it off.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

but we don't agree. the government infringes on so-called inalienable rights all the time. often without repercussion.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you agree that you believe in what everyone else calls rights, just that governments aren't perfect. Which nobody said they were.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no. I believe they don't exist, and the fact of infringement proves that. they are a fiction, and one that creates barriers to liberty.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is such an idiotic take. They aren't a fiction. Sure, there isn't some sort of magical guarantee you have them, but that doesn't make the term or concept less useful.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they are literally made up. there is no empirical evidence of their existence.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What in the solipsism am I reading right now. Multiple countries and international groups have things called rights. They exist.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

it has no mass and no energy. it's a social construct, and it does not serve it's purported function. it's a fiction.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

do you know how I know that you don't know what solipsism is?

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When people are told to change their behavior, sometimes their response is just to say fuck off. How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with? How would you deal with conflicting values? As much as governments are the single largest cause of mass murders and deaths, this is the one thing they are good for: defining parameters.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 weeks ago

How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with?

none of this necessitates rights

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, then why does that sound nice? You gotta see where I'm going with this.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't care for your interrogative style. say what you want.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I want you to understand how your concept of a just society ultimately depends on natural rights, whether or not we call them rights.

Why do you want everyone to be equal and free, why would that be nice? Why should we care?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I want you to understand how your concept of a just society ultimately depends on natural rights, whether or not we call them rights.

no, it doesn't.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 weeks ago

saying it doesn't make it true.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you want everyone to be equal and free, why would that be nice? Why should we care?

say what you want to say. i don't care for your interrogative style.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am literally asking, and just explained why.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and I am telling you I don't care to be interrogated. I said what I wanted to say.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It looks like I'm not the only person who's trying to explain this to you, and you're responding to everyone the same way.

Your idea is incoherent and you need to either listen to people or educate yourself.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago

you haven't explained anything, you've made unsupported claims.