this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

Transgender

456 readers
160 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser for ios. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (11 children)

You know what they call a party where they don't kick out Nazis and fascists?

A Nazi party.

[–] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I don't think she's saying this because she prefers it, but rather because she sees it is necessary.

“If, for instance, we want to have a majoritarian coalition — not just electorally, but specifically on issues around trans rights — that, by necessity, is going to have to include people who have a range of thoughts,” McBride continued.

She is clearly arguing that its more effective to be open to a range of ideas than to not so.

“A binary choice between being all-on or all-off is not constructive for anyone,” she said. “It impedes the very needed path toward winning electorally, winning hearts and minds, and, most importantly, winning progress.”

Politics is a strategic war. Its very simple to be 100%, non-compromising, in-support of something. But is that the most effective path forward?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They want to eliminate trans people, so let's compromise and only eliminate half. Hooray! We're civil!

[–] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see value in being uncompromising (look at Richard Stallman in Free Software). I also see value in giving a little in the right areas for a net gain.

I don't think McBride thinks that this is the ultimatum given at the moment (100% vs 50% of trans people die), that would explain why she is willing to compromise.

If she did see it that way, she would probably do the same as you.

Her wanting to compromise at this moment does not mean she would compromise in the worst of moments.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I don't think McBride thinks that this is the ultimatum given at the moment

It's not, but the whole point is erosion of civil rights by generating hate then just swinging for the fences. I was gonna say death by a thousand cuts but it's not even that anymore.

What does she expect to compromise on? Trans athletes? It doesn't matter. We're past that point already. Trans people can't even get a proper passport anymore.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)