this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
575 points (97.8% liked)

YUROP

2259 readers
2 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Topics that should not be discussed here:

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We (the west) helped them become who they are. We relocated all our production there because they were cheap and didn't mind throwing a bunch of poor people into the grinder. Arguably, the fastest and most efficient way for them to get out from under our thumb was authoritarian rule. Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

The world could've looked very different had the US not meddled in a lot of countries. Here's an entire list that probably has about 70 countries on it.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

had the US not meddled in a lot of countries

Hold on a sec, you can't get off the hook that easy, Europe

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

Literally the sentence above it

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sentence still makes it sound like you think the US has been unilaterally directing western colonialism, but European nations have independently taken the initiative on that quite a bit

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

It's ridiculing the lack of agency European countries chose to have when being pulled into various wars and missions with the US. The comment additionally starts off with "We (the west)". If Europe doesn't belong to "the west", then where do they belong to?

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That sentence takes away agency from those European "vassals". The British and French empires still exist to this day. They conduct their own foreign policy and are in charge of their own internal security and territorial integrity.

The person you're responding to is absolutely right.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

Funny how you are able to use hyperbole without recognising it yourself.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, no - they definitely don't still exist. Their marks are still left on the places they once subjugated, sure, but they definitely do not exist anymore.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tell that to northern Ireland, Scotland, Gibraltar, French Guiana or Polynesia.

Both countries still have overseas territories all over the world. It doesn't matter how hard you, they or anyone else tries to legitimize those colonies, that's still what they are.

Why were the French using the Polynesian islands as nuclear testing grounds up through 1996? Would the French government be so lax with testing in their own country? No - that's why they did it in a colony with 200,000 brown people instead.

[–] oce@jlai.lu -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sadly a better partner than the USA currently.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No. Just because the US has become worse than before and China didn't, even if the US closed in on how bad China is, that doesn't make China better than the US. More reliable, yes, but not better.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Reliability is a big part of a good trading partner. Also helps if you can be reasoned with.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cheap (slave) labor is also good for trade I guess. And an authoritarian regime is nice for stability.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you talking about USA or China?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

To be fair, dictatorships are brittle, they are 100% stable up until suddenly they collapse.

Just look at assad.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

China seems to be lawful neutral. Much easier to deal with than USA's current chaotic evil.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compared to USA, yes. Their own logic and code they follow.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Doesn't help that the stupid simple DnD system can't possibly give a decent explanation of the differences between the USA and China.

But yes, the USA is currently more threatening towards Europe and Canada than China is. The USA is also significantly more chaotic/unpredictable/unreasonable/insane.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On which points do you think the current USA government is better than China's one?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems so since you disagreed with my initial comment.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What I say is that we shouldn't trade extensively neither with China nor the US. Fuck China, fuck the US.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How do I put this: Being under China would suck, but it would still be drasticaly better as they don't exterminate people out of sheer spite.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

The Uyghurs would disagree.

Unless I'm misreading your comment.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Relevant username

[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a different point. The subject was which is a better partner currently.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

And the answer is they're both bad. Sometimes, even if you ask "A or B?" the answer is neither.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee -3 points 1 week ago

Wow. That's like, one of the stupidest things I've read in a while.