this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
95 points (99.0% liked)
Slop.
473 readers
471 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She's certainly got an older feel to her writing. I feel like it requires more work to get into, but I find the payoff is usually worth it. This might sound weird, but I think she had higher expectations from her readers than most authors have nowadays.
It does have that feel, I can tell she is a great writer. I'll have to give it another go. It takes a little effort to fully visualize what she writes probably because it is just more advanced prose than most things I read, I read a lot more non-fiction these days than novels so it's a little tricky at times to interpret the more poetic/metaphoric style, especially when I am stressed and can't focus well.
I totally get what you mean; Starting off, her books always have a dimmer picture in my head. As if the images were being illuminated by a flickering candle that could go out at any time. It takes quite a few chapters before I feel like I'm getting the full picture.
Just an aside, but I strongly suspect this is like a literary equivalent to shows being made for second screens.