For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
Fascism is a death cult, example number 9999999999.
Correct. Some folks, myself and miz included, would prefer that.
Clearly, we just had two different interactions.
My perspective is that you asked a question (how would you prefer it?) and I answered your question.
It seems like you didn't like that. Why?
Because you've ignored every criticism of why that preference is irrelevant to conversation at hand. I did not make my original comment with the intention of debating graph aesthetics, I did so to remind people that they are taking part in a mass disabling event by people who are openly trading in eugenics rhetoric. Much of that rhetoric being directed towards the people of this very community, which is largely not showing solidarity with the other people who are victims of said rhetoric and their associated policies.
I can definitely acknowledge that graph aesthetics aren't as important as the real-world implications of the underlying data. I did not start the thread about graph aesthetics, though.
You asked miz about their graph aesthetic preference, and I answered bc it's a common preference. I assumed that you were asking because you wanted to learn, and I answered in good faith. If you didn't want to talk about it, just don't ask questions about it?
I ignored your criticisms because I don't really care about other people's graph aesthetic preferences, because it's not important and they're my preferences.
If you had said "what flavor ice cream do you prefer?" and I said "many people prefer chocolate because ", it would weird if you got upset and said "actually vanilla is better because and also why are we even talking about ice cream preferences it's not important".
At any point, you could have said "I think this representation is appropriate, given the severity of the situation, but I understand the other perspective." and that would have been the end of the conversation.
Disengaging.