this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1225 points (98.0% liked)

Transgender

635 readers
135 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy just keeps getting more and more wonderful ❤️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Joanne’s really milking this cash cow for all it’s worth, and then some. Guess that’s your only option when you’re a one-hit wonder, though. Must not have stumbled across any new content she’s interested in plagiarizing.

[–] PangurBan@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You say that like anyone else wouldn't. If life gives you a golden cow, milk the shit out of it. Lol

Let's focus on her being a terrible person instead of making up nonsense reasons to further dislike her. There's no need.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I think most people wouldn't. Most people would be happy with literally becoming a fucking billionaire, and would be satisfied at that point.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't know any billionaires myself, but judging from what I read and see online that is not what people do when they literally become a billionaire.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess it's one of those things, where most people would be satisfied with becoming a billionaire, but generally, the type of people able to become a billionaire, are terrible people that wouldn't be satisfied with becoming a billionaire.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TIL People who would be satisfied with being a billionaire feel satisfied long before they actually become a billionaire.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Money has high diminishing returns on happiness long before a billion. It wouldn't be surprising if literally nobody was satisfied by crossing 1,000,000,000. Some people will never be satisfied and they're the only ones who would keep trying.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds... terribly logical.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I think most billionaires are not very visible.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, you could tell the point in book 4 where they said "Fuck it, bring in the ghost writers".

I doubt she's probably written anything in 30 years that wasn't drunkenly pounded out on Twitter

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Makes sense, since I think it's a lot better than the previous books.

[–] Katzimir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

CouLd you point me to what original she plagiarized? I need some light reading material and this sounds promising.

[–] J1m1ny@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm not a fan of Harry Potter, and don't like Rowling, but I read that whole damn essay and was not at all convinced. Half the examples could be said to be plagiarising each other by the standard they're using. They say at the start the coincidences are too strong to be attributed to tropes, but I really disagree with that. Almost everything they list are common tropes, many even outside magical wizard settings. Mean adoptive family? Did she also plagiarise Cinderella?

Sure, her books generally aren't original themes, but to say they're so similar that they are direct plagiarism is a real stretch in my opinion. Especially when you have to list like 30 books that have one or two things in common each, and mostly in a general sense.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Exactly. It shouldn't be considered a crime to use and build on eternal tropes. That's what culture is about. The terrible things about JKR lie elsewhere.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The first two or three books felt far more like a Roald Dahl novel than any standard issue YA novel.

She's clearly been influenced by other children's books. But yeah, so much of the "Rowling plagiarized!" critique boils down to how bland and generic the story was.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

I never thought she was a plagiarist, just a hack.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think they're referring to A Wizard of Earthsea? It's been on my reading list for a few years now, but I still haven't gotten around to it.

[–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

That's not really similar but i recommend reading it. I loved it as a child

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

one-hit wonder,

Yeah, no kidding, I had tried everything else she did before she started getting really noisy, none of it was remotely interesting.

Stopped me from buying the books for my kids quickly enough, though.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She's a terrible person, but saying she's a one-hit wonder is unfair. Here's a list of famous and acclaimed authors who only wrote one novel. And she wrote several, even if all in the same series. Criticize for for her true faults: being a hateful hag that makes the world a worse place and isn't worth the O2 she consumes.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I don't think the existence of other one-hit wonders affects her status as one-hit wonder, but I'll accept the argument that she wrote ~7 popular books.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

HBO previously did a adaption of The Casually Vacancy. I never watched it but I read the book which is terrible.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, what did you find terrible about the book? I thought it was sad but written with a lot of empathy. I liked the gray characters. It was even worse for me to realize what JKR was like after reading this book that seemed so right to me. But maybe I overlooked something.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago