this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
530 readers
488 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Kind of embarassing that I even know this, but their reasoning goes
And if you assume that the supply is lowered enough, then tons of people die and it becomes genocide. Of course, the flip side of this that this person completely ignored is that price distortions can also occur in the other direction, where prices are high enough to entice more than sufficient production, but so high that it limits purchases from consumers. Currently, the American medical industry is firmly in that side of pricing (as evident by the fact that the rest of the world has much lower drug prices* and no shortages of drugs).
*even if you account for wage differences.
This is all econ 101 theory. Often times, you barely need to remember 101 shit to dunk on these so called "economics students", who didn't even properly learn the bourgeois version of the theory, only how to party and act arrogant online.
If something like that happens, it's not the price control doing morally reprehensible killing, it's the system and ownership of the means of production using them irresponsibly doing the killing. Maybe things that save lives don't need a market to tell you they're an important societal good.
If I try to escape an open air prison so you start doing an ethnic cleansing of that prison, we're not in equal footing in terms of being bad.
The biggest selling point for a command economy is literally the housing crisis.
How is the housing crisis real? Just plan your economy lmao.
Well there's plenty of planning that goes into it, it's just in the direction of capital concentration at the expense of people being dignified
We already live in a planned economy (the free-market absolutists will tell you all about government interventions in the housing market). In fact, pretty much all modern large scale industry runs on the principles of planned economy. The problem is that the economy is planned by the capitalists and their lackeys. What we need is nationalization.
You will always have a planned economy. The only real question is "planned by whom?"
Obviously that goes without saying. The best solution is single payer healthcare and a nationalised pharmaceuticals industry.
However, a poorly implemented price control will fuck your economy and general welfare unless you have a communist economy and transcended money.
Maybe Trump will do a well implemented price control
I want to provide a bit more insight to the brain of this guy. They really beat the 1970s oil crisis into you at GMU as an example of price controls creating shortages. On top of this, the negotiating power of pharmaceutical companies is usually greater than a governments. Drugs are priced not by how much a consumer is able to pay but by how much the government doesn't want their population to die, which is why you see drug prices in the $100k range. Pharmaceutical companies will happily let people die to get a better bargaining position.