this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
787 points (96.9% liked)

Political Memes

8525 readers
3114 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 6 points 18 hours ago (21 children)

I believe it's actually the opposite. So many extremists or "I don’t agree with you therefore you’re a troll" bullshit.

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

Seeing as I have not been banned for anything I have to disagree.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

It really depends on the community and the mods awake at the time.

One of my accounts got a week ban from a larger community for being "accusatory". Because I said someone sounded like they were spreading misinformation.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

Depends on the things you say, where…

If you’re generally leftist, you should mostly be fine.

Otherwise you get banned for trolling (because ofc they’re right so you’re trolling) or transphobia, because if you don’t agree with everything a trans person says, you’re transphobic. Also, the world belongs to them.

Talk about lesser known subjects by the public or make a mistake yourself? Thats it, you’re banned for misinformation and trolling. Or being a nazi or racist or whatever. The words don’t have a meaning anymore

Also the random ban reasons like "Rule 3" which refers to the most open and subjective rules like "Be civil" or "Dont be a dick" or similar

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Depends on the things you say

So not "pretty much anything" then.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

I thought it was obvious that it was an exaggeration. If you go out of the normal way, according to the mods, well you’re fucked

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 41 minutes ago

Well we're disagreeing right now, so logically only one of us can be "the normal way" yet neither of us are banned...

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

All I did was misgender Kris by calling them a "xir".

They were arguing over gender, and I was feeling like being contrarian...

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 0 points 7 hours ago

I guess this is supposed to be ironic?

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a lot of generalizing. Probably deserved your ban to be honest.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Believe whatever you want. I’m saying that based on my experience.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, and you made a pretty blanket statement about all trans people, or ig all trans people on Lemmy, based on your experience with like, a handful of people?

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

If you want an example, I said trans athletes being in man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

I believe the use of "biological men" trigged them when I said that transgender women were that… when I was talking about scientific stuff to make my point.

Super transphobic, watch out! ☢️ -_-

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

Studies have found the only Olympic events in which trans women might have an advantage over cis women is mid range sprints. There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

If you want to talk about equality in sports the biggest inequality that affects outcomes is money. Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Studies did not find that there’s a lack of advantage as well, therefore why use it as a point? What I meant is that there’s place for a debate on this question.

There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this. A sample size inferior to thousands is not sufficient to test anyways.

Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems. We’re all unequal on this :(

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 0 points 12 hours ago

Oh and also the double standards

You can hope for Musk and Trump or any rich fuck to die, but do this with someone else and you’re banned

load more comments (18 replies)