109
‘It’s disgusting’: Top Democratic donors rant about Mamdani’s primary win
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)
politics
22713 readers
352 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As far as I’ve seen thus far, Mamdani:
Also, Jeffries sucks.
I think it’s high time we take over the Democratic Party and drive these dinosaurs out, with pitchforks if need be.
I think this is actually antisemitic.
Zionists are not "Jewish supremacists", they specifically oppose and oppress a number of different kinds of Jews (including Holocaust survivors and Ethiopian Jews). They also oppose Jews who choose to live outside of Isr*el, or Jews who are theologically opposed to the Zionist project.
To conflate all Jews with the Zionist project is the same anti-Semitism the zionists commit.
This is exactly 1 for 1 like saying that calling America a white supremacist state is racist against white people. After all, it's not run for the benefit of ALL white people!!! Except worse in that anti semitism is a real thing.
I suggest that you should probably not peddle great replacement level nonsense. It's fucking offensive.
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
It's not controversial here to say that equating Judaism and Zionism is actually antisemitic.
Calling Zionism "Jewish supremacy" equates Zionism and Judaism.
Zionism is not synonymous with Judaism. Most zionists are not Jewish.
Eta: I'm basing this off my understanding of this piece: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Essay:Zionism_is_antisemitism,_and_Palestine
No, it doesn't. Why would it? Calling Zionism "Judaism" would, but saying "Jewish supremacy" is the guiding ideology of Zionism doesn't. You can't just say dumb shit like this, you have to justify it. And your link doesn't! It doesn't say anything about Jewish supremacy. It says equating Zionism to Judaism is anti Semitic, which... No shit? No one here disagrees with that, least of all me! But no one is SAYING that, because saying "Zionism is a Jewish supremacist ideology" is NOT the same as equating Zionism and Judaism, because Judaism IS NOT JEWISH SUPREMACY.
The explicit goal of Zionists is a Jewish state where exclusively Jewish people hold power. They enact their laws on the basis of maintaining that power. They are very clear about this. That is Jewish supremacy, just like building a country like America, where white people hold power and laws are enacted to keep white people in power, is white supremacy. No shit that's not what Judaism is, it's a whole separate thing, that's why it has a different name.
I would really, really like to know what part of that essay supports your position, because I don't see it. I would also like to know what you think "Jewish supremacist" means because it sounds like you think it just means "Jewish", which is obviously a painfully illiterate position, so it can't be that, right?
Disengage
So, no answer? I am genuinely curious how saying "Zionism is Jewish supremacist" could be read as "Zionism is Judaism", which appears to be your objection.