this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

Slop.

560 readers
472 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Real anti-authoritarian moment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I'm usually on board with Cassie's takes (she's a solid organizer from what I can tell), but in this case I gotta say its a bit elitist.

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I hate to say it but I kind of agree with her, as someone who has family in Appalachia. There's a bit of fetishization of the rural working class (especially Appalachia due to the history of miners unions) on the left but I don't really think we can compare the material conditions of these people to that of Russian or Chinese peasantry. For one most of these people at least own the land they're living on, they may be poor otherwise but that gives them a degree of autonomy and dignity tenant farmers lack.

But regardless there still irony in a bunch of anti-ML libertarian socialists suddenly calling the rural poor "backwards" cuz they voted for a cheeto.

[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I agree to an extent that it is foolish, or maybe naive to think that the rural working class will easily ally with the left because of guns or whatever, but its at least as ridiculous as leaning the other way with the "country bumpkin" schtick. Its twitter though, where nuance goes to die. Shitposters shitting on shitposters shitting on shitposters

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’d still argue that “Berniecrat + gunz” is more likely to be a winning platform in some areas of flyover country than something like pete

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You also need Bernie, who is a likable white dude to a lot of people

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah that’s one of the core problems with the Democrats from a pure campaign horse race perspective. They refuse to buil up the local and state parties outside of the coastal enclaves and they have a centralized, focus grouped control of everything. So instead of local characters people will like, they run the most soulless, out of central casting robots.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)