Harris’s economic agenda also includes the expansion of the existing $5,000 tax deduction for start-up firms to $50,000. This, The Post has reported, is an attempt to draw a contrast with Trump, who has called for reducing the tax rate paid by corporations and maintaining lower tax rates for high-income people, along with policies aimed at helping people in other tax brackets.

That’s what American politics has come to, “giving additional tax breaks to corporations” vs “giving additional tax credits to new corporations” is presented as the “divide” between the two pseudo-state parties.

Question is, which is more annoying? The people who care about policy but think democrats will actually make good on the promises? Or the people who don’t care and just want vibes?

The first group are showing more intellectual seriousness in caring about policy, but that they think democrats are serious about policy shows they’re either naive or only care about appearing serious. The vibes people are less serious on the surface, but it f it is all spectacle then there’s a realism to doubling down on the spectacle.

Mind you I’m not talking about what an actual Harris presidency would accomplish, I’m talking about campaign marketing.

Yeah coconut brat summer works for the immediate, but summer’s ending soon and her campaign is going to start looking shallow if there’s no Big Idea policy proposal.

“M’lord Roberts! I do so hope my tributes please you. Look, I have adorned my least greasy Rush shirt for the glorious occasion of meeting you in the flesh.”

Yes, the personifications of corporate inefficiency will bring about government efficiency, very big brained.

The advertisers are selling a dashboard that the marketing department can use to razzle dazzle the higher ups

So this is bullshit on a few levels:

The overall population levels listed correspond to England, but the data they used for the number of trans women is for England and Wales.

Furthermore, the census data showed ~262,000 trans individuals in England and Wales however:

In response to the Census, 118,000 people indicated that they were transgender but did not specify whether they identified as a trans woman or a trans man. Of those who did, the data was evenly split between those who identified as trans men, and those who identified as trans women – with 48,000 people identifying as each.

So that’s not the number of trans women in total, it’s the number of trans women who chose to disclose their gender identity. The ratio of those that disclosed was a third trans men, a third trans women, and another third nonbinary or other gender identities. Assuming the did not disclose trans individuals follow the same pattern, that’s 78,600 trans women.

I couldn’t find where the 92 trans women sex offender stat was derived from. However, it’s important to note that sex work is typically lumped in as a sexual offense. And we know how love to arrest people for “being trans while walking.”

The leopards continue to feast on faces

Pretty sure this is the pinnacle of asablackman tactics

If your primary interest in being a woman is sexual, I hope you have a plan for your 40’s and onwards

Because we all know the moment a woman hits forty, her sexuality just ceases to exist overnight and they never want to have sex or are sexually desired ever again. Transphobes can’t help but shuttle in some misogyny in with the transphobia.

John “greed is good but only when it’s capitalists being greedy” Stossel.