this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1212 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

1771 readers
921 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 131 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

He's such a pervert.

Says he'd date his daughter if she wasnt his daughter

Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots

Rapes a child and then the case 'disappears'

Gets charged for sexual assault and then slanders the woman who won the case. Ordered to pay her over 80 million in damages which of course he wont

Sexually assaulted a woman who was trying out for the Apprentice

Says 'you can grab them by the pussy'

His first wife accused him of rape during their divorce proceedings

TWENTY FIVE women have publicly accused him of sexual assault. One or two could be a conspiracy but 25?!!

This perverted asshole should be behind bars NOT pretending to be king of America.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

he raped his wife, whos is now buried at his golf resort for tax purposes.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Including "Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots" is a little sad, there's nothing wrong with that. Everything else on that list is fucking heinous though

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

I wish I could do soft porn for a living. But I'm an ugly looking guy. But those who can should be allowed to. It's a job.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (4 children)

To be clear, there's nothing wrong with marrying a woman who does soft porn. It's only worth mentioning in the context of the rest of the stuff.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 day ago

To me, it's only "worth" mentioning in the context of political hypocrisy.

Outside of that, I don't like it being demonized either.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's worth mentioning not because it's objectionable, but because how he sees it is objectionable.

[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

I absolutely agree with everything you said, and I also wholeheartedly agree that the orange idiot is a pervert and most likely a pedophile. However, being with a person who has worked as a sex worker does not make someone a pervert.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Hell, even if 24 were a conspiracy, just the last remaining one makes him a rapist. And at least one was held up in court.

Our country should not be run by a rapist.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Suppresses Epstein list for completely unknown and certainly not ulterior motives.

[–] user224 3 points 1 day ago

I am not sure what to highlight from there, but there's a lot of info here: https://medium.com/@mistagrinch/an-unsettling-pattern-a-comprehensive-look-at-trumps-sexual-controversies-and-underworld-a876887ecd85

There's also sources, which might be worth checking. There's at least one unconfirmed thing from some Washington post draft that was later removed from the final article.
The only response about it seems fo be "We (or the Washington Post Writers Group, our affiliated syndicate) edit every column to try to make it as good as it can be. We don't think it would be fair to our writers to discuss the editing process, and don't see what is to be gained by talking about things that are not published — there are countless drafts that never see the light of day."