Yeah they aren't doing much to protect them.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
800 points (99.9% liked)
Political Memes
1764 readers
935 users here now
Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
protect? they are actively grooming and throwing them in the meat grinder
He's such a pervert.
Says he'd date his daughter if she wasnt his daughter
Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots
Rapes a child and then the case 'disappears'
Gets charged for sexual assault and then slanders the woman who won the case. Ordered to pay her over 80 million in damages which of course he wont
Sexually assaulted a woman who was trying out for the Apprentice
Says 'you can grab them by the pussy'
His first wife accused him of rape during their divorce proceedings
TWENTY FIVE women have publicly accused him of sexual assault. One or two could be a conspiracy but 25?!!
This perverted asshole should be behind bars NOT pretending to be king of America.
Including "Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots" is a little sad, there's nothing wrong with that. Everything else on that list is fucking heinous though
To be clear, there's nothing wrong with marrying a woman who does soft porn. It's only worth mentioning in the context of the rest of the stuff.
In your humble opinion, sure. I know a lot of guys who wouldn't date a porn 'star' because they usually have other issues that make them undateable. And Im speaking from experience. I worked with sex workers for five years in a street outreach in a major city. Every single one of those girls/guys were there because of bad circumstances in their lives - and it was very often abuse or drugs that kept them locked into sex work. The whole idea that its a victimless job if you do it online is a joke. Its a sick world and it only destroys people's souls in the long run.
To me, it's only "worth" mentioning in the context of political hypocrisy.
Outside of that, I don't like it being demonized either.
It's worth mentioning not because it's objectionable, but because how he sees it is objectionable.
I absolutely agree with everything you said, and I also wholeheartedly agree that the orange idiot is a pervert and most likely a pedophile. However, being with a person who has worked as a sex worker does not make someone a pervert.
Hell, even if 24 were a conspiracy, just the last remaining one makes him a rapist. And at least one was held up in court.
Our country should not be run by a rapist.
Suppresses Epstein list for completely unknown and certainly not ulterior motives.
I am not sure what to highlight from there, but there's a lot of info here: https://medium.com/@mistagrinch/an-unsettling-pattern-a-comprehensive-look-at-trumps-sexual-controversies-and-underworld-a876887ecd85
There's also sources, which might be worth checking. There's at least one unconfirmed thing from some Washington post draft that was later removed from the final article.
The only response about it seems fo be "We (or the Washington Post Writers Group, our affiliated syndicate) edit every column to try to make it as good as it can be. We don't think it would be fair to our writers to discuss the editing process, and don't see what is to be gained by talking about things that are not published — there are countless drafts that never see the light of day."
"But what if...I were to put on a wig and pretend to be a woman so I can watch women in the restroom even though there are stalls and I wouldn't be able to see anything? Oh ho ho ho ho, delightfully devilish, Seymour!"
Not a wig but we do have the first president/vice president team that wears makeup
I thought they all did it.
The same Republicans who think adolescent legal marriage age is fine just as it is? Those Republicans?
It really sucks, hypocrisy and can't be held to the same standards.
Imagine if so and so said or done anything trump has.
They know, but they don’t care because it’s not actually about that for them. It’s just business.