this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
122 points (99.2% liked)

Atheism

6077 readers
77 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

Another hilarious chart.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That argument

I made no attempt at an argument in defense of anyone in that poll; I wrote the comment because I knew if I didn't, some annoying wannabe pedant was going to come in about "hurr durr papal infallibility" not knowing what they're talking about.

It would be more consistent to think that they are simply ignorant with regard to both doctrines.

I agree. Everything I said, as noted, was preempting misguided pedantry, not about what any of the people in the poll actually believe.

[โ€“] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I made no attempt at an argument in defense of anyone in that poll

I didn't mean to reference an argument in defense of the poll takers, but the argument that Catholics are allowed by doctrine to disagree with the Pope. I just wanted to say that the doctrine doesn't matter if people we are measuring by the doctrine are unaware of it or ignorant of its ramifications.

With that understanding, in people in this case could disagree with the pope, knowing that it was permissible, it would hint that they would have this nearly unthinkably disparate understanding of their own religion.