this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
336 points (99.4% liked)

News

37709 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Addendum quietly slipped into widely criticized agreement creating a $1.7bn fund to compensate president’s allies

The justice department quietly added a provision barring the IRS from auditing Donald Trump’s tax returns on Tuesday, amending a widely criticized agreement that creates a secretive and loosely controlled $1.776bn fund to compensate allies of the president.

The addendum, signed by Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, says the government is “forever barred” and “precluded” from examining the tax returns of Trump, his family, company and “related companies”. The agreement applies to anything filed before the agreement was reached. It was posted on the justice department website on Tuesday morning, a day after the department announced creation of the fund.

The inclusion only adds to mounting scrutiny of the wider agreement reached on Tuesday. The arrangement was announced after Trump said he was dropping a $10bn lawsuit against the IRS and other specious claims against the government in exchange for creating the compensation fund. IRS officials recommended fighting Trump’s lawsuit, the New York Times reported on Tuesday, but the agency decided to settle it anyway, raising further questions about improper interference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The protest voters came after the dems turned an election into a circus with a side of genocide.

That's what I mean by chaine of events, the protest voters ignoring etc and making mistakes came after the dems deliberate actions.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't make the voter behavior any less shitty

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Nope, it doesn't. That being said, there's a group of people that essentially paid the dems to lose last election, and they don't want to be seen as the problem that they are.

Blaming and shaming voters only helps that group. It doesn't help us, it doesn't help democracy, it doesn't help the party. Alienating isn't the best way to make them vote either. Tbh, it shouldn't be up to them to cave first when it's about genocide in any case.

It's misspent energy and detracts from the pressure that the party should be facing. It's as I said, a scapegoat built to avoid having to change.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Taking up for those douches doesn't help anything either. There's basically nothing we can do besides be informed and vote like we are. Which brings us back to my original point. If protests worked on this scale, they probably would have already. America is basically fucked and we fucked ourselves. I expect politicians to suck. But I don't expect millions to choose country-suicide. Anything over 10% voting for this (or not against it) is extremely concerning. We're SO far over that mark. And it would never happen if people were as educated as we think we are. All of this makes more sense when you realize some huge amount of adults are functionally illiterate. It's so fucking sad and enraging how badly we've all been failed and failed ourselves.