this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
222 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21566 readers
736 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oak would not resort to these tactics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

low-level felony

I very much am against discrimination of anybody who has contact with our criminal justice system, but still, lol.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Gotta pump up those numbers. You need 30+ felony counts to be president. Professor probably needs at least a few more.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think the problem is not the crime he is accused of but the fact that he has outstanding arrest warrants he is hiding from. It would be awkward if all the kids gather for a tournament and as the judge is explaining game rules cops burst in and drag him away.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Dunno either way, it was just his direct quote where he described the felony as "low level" which was funny to me. Generally any felony is quite disqualifying for these corps arguing that's unreasonable is quite a hill to climb.