this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
389 points (100.0% liked)
PC Master Race
21205 readers
1229 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have several friends that work at AMD and NVIDIA in the graphics (hw and sw) groups. They’re all in a slow transition to other compute groups. Their comments are that once we got ray tracing there wasn’t much in terms of hardware optimization for them other than increasing memory bandwidth. Everything else comes down to software.
Multi frame generation and dlss has made give improvements. It's pretty clear that with a little more improvements, gpus will be able to output 5-10x the data with the same hardware. I'm not surprised they are focusing on that right now.
Output 5-10x with same HW? I need what you're smoking because the current HW can barely handle current amounts of data, let alone a magnitude more
Multi frame generation was already possible with Lossless. The fact that it's only officially supported by one generation of cards is absolute bullshit.
Lossless adds lag, mfg uses a whole different gpu pipeline. They are not even close to the same performance. I've used both and it'a night and day in terms of total system latency. I would never use lossless for gaming that requires input speed. Now using lossless for visual novels to limit cpu demand, but that is about it
Maybe 5-10%?
I can expect 5-10% hardware improvements, but the sugar e improvements on the 50 series is amazing. The 50 series is the new 1080ti in terms of the jump.