this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
389 points (100.0% liked)

PC Master Race

21205 readers
921 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Every second Nvidia abandons consumers in favor of businesses for the majority of their sales, China improves their manufacturing and prepares to flood the global market, including the USA, with cheap yet powerful GPUs.

It's only a matter of time before this AI bubble pops, and the US government bails out these corporations with our fucking tax dollars.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not going to pop because it's about building datacenters and Ai for the control system of human beings. Not for chat bots.

This is the infrastructure for dystopia that is coming up and people think it's about AI chat bots... Why do people continue to trust what these companies say instead of look at what they do?

Nvidia is heavily invested in robots as well. Because they know where this is going.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

From chat bots to murder bots in a blink of an eye.

[–] Gh0strunner@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Dont worry, there are no tax dollars left.

The cmegroup, where metals and oil are traded, has a profit of 770 million dollars.

Meaning it will take over a decades of the cme's straight up profit to pay off one of the cheeto in chief's recent grifts.

One.

He has pulled off multiple ten thousand million dollar heists of us taxpayer money in the last year.

There wont be a bailout, these fucks are spending that cash as quickly as they possibly can under the expectation that the dollar is about to be worthless.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Because they helped speed run it's crash

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sprack@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I have several friends that work at AMD and NVIDIA in the graphics (hw and sw) groups. They’re all in a slow transition to other compute groups. Their comments are that once we got ray tracing there wasn’t much in terms of hardware optimization for them other than increasing memory bandwidth. Everything else comes down to software.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 8 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Multi frame generation and dlss has made give improvements. It's pretty clear that with a little more improvements, gpus will be able to output 5-10x the data with the same hardware. I'm not surprised they are focusing on that right now.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

Output 5-10x with same HW? I need what you're smoking because the current HW can barely handle current amounts of data, let alone a magnitude more

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Multi frame generation was already possible with Lossless. The fact that it's only officially supported by one generation of cards is absolute bullshit.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Lossless adds lag, mfg uses a whole different gpu pipeline. They are not even close to the same performance. I've used both and it'a night and day in terms of total system latency. I would never use lossless for gaming that requires input speed. Now using lossless for visual novels to limit cpu demand, but that is about it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 17 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

At least for now, the consumer DIY PC market as we know it is gone.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

Gone is too strong of a word. Inaccessible to more Americans then before, yes, but not gone.

[–] berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm kinda glad I kept reading into this the past 6 months to a year. I made the decision to buy a beefy PC and I don't intend to do any upgrades over the next 10 years. Did this juuuust a littlebit before the RAM's price spiking up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe now devs will care about optimization since nobody can buy GPUs hence no one will pay for a game that they cant run. Either optimization or bankrupcy ig.

[–] Geologist@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Honestly, this is such a nice silver lining, my 3080 that’s like 6 years old is still working fine even on newer titles since no one is making/ buying better cards (or cards with more VRAM) in large quantities.

I can’t remember having a GPU this old that was still relevant, my old 780ti was so limited by its 3gb vram.

[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Just wait until driver support is ended by nvidia. I have two P40 which are powerful and work well but nvidia just ended support (for compute) but I think the point still stands. Maybe it will be better with the new oss drivers

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

my cynical mind just thinks that they will just sell licenses to big corpo with those big data centres who will push for online remote gaming and two things will happen, either massive exodus of gaming studios or clueless majority of population will simply gobble small subscription fees to game online at 4fps

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

From what I’ve read, they don’t care because they don’t want us buying them. Their big picture sees us doing online cloud gaming through a virtual computer that you connect to. They no longer want anybody to have home PC’s.

Edit typos

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When that happens, its imperitive that you dont participate. We need to reuse, and repair current and older machines.

[–] kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’d much rather game on old hardware or janky arm based stuff than use hardware as a service, even if it means being 10+ years behind in performance. There are so many great games that will run on pretty much anything

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago

I ardently wish that gamers, or at least people who spend money on games, were better at withholding their filthy lucre.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dooms all these yes. There is no cheating the speed of light

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Imagine instead of cloud gaming we bring this hardware directly to the customer by renting it to them. Reduced latency but still maintaining those hefty profit margins.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago

that's fine. my library is big enough that I probably don't need to buy a single game for the rest of my life

I will, but I won't need to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 81 points 1 day ago

Good. Let them dig their own grave. The world is currently figuring out how to do training and inference without using GPUs. They will ultimately be left behind.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (22 children)

They're making a solid bet here.

Look at the breakdown from Steam surveys, it's almost always ~75% Nvidia. They know they have the gamer market down on lock and they know gamers aren't going to buy something else as long as their competitor can't fake as many frames as them and they know they have a lock on developers in a Ouroboros of vendor lock of more fake frames and AI slop filters that leads to more gamers who clamor for more fake frames and bad AI instagram filters.

Meanwhile they're making money hand over fist with stupid AI and that money is money without relying directly on being AI for the most part so if the bubble bursts it's not like they're going to be overly hurt and then they know they can pivot right back to fake frames and slop filters and gamers will come running right back.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It could change relatively quickly though. Consider that Valve's devices are all ultimately AMD devices. If Valve's bet pays off, then those numbers should change (to what extent, I don't know).

The Linux gaming community in general (which small as it is, is growing) is definitely shifting AMD. On the nvidia side are a bunch of driver woes and poor support. Meanwhile AMD's drivers are literally baked into the kernel. No contest for ease.

This could all be wrong. Definitely. But the optimist in me sees a glimmer of hope depending on where the enthusiast community goes, how successful Valve is with their coming machines, etc.

Orrrrr... The whole PC enthusiast community dies because AI keeps driving prices into the sky and it never recovers in any meaningful way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Everything they leave is up for grabs. Someone will take their place. Let's just hope it's soon.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›