Work Reform

16460 readers

219 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

159

Big Tech’s Anti-Labor Playbook Has Come for Wikipedia (medium.com)

submitted 1 week ago by dwzap@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In ten days last month, the Wikimedia Foundation fired the longtime lead developer of MediaWiki and disbanded the team whose entire job was to listen to volunteers. Most of the people they fired were union organizers. Wikipedia’s editors are now threatening to strike in solidarity. The Foundation is sitting on $296 million in reserves and a freshly profitable AI revenue stream. This is a confrontation with global implications.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fantastic article. Is there anyway non editors can support action?

[–] Reyali@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I decided to cancel my recurring donation, citing these actions as why.

Here’s the email I wrote:

I would like to cancel my recurring donation in response to Wikimedia’s decision to fire Brooke Vibber and the Community Tech team. I love Wikipedia, but I have concerns around the anti-union and anti-community actions that are happening under the current leadership. I will not in good conscience continue to support a “nonprofit” organization that is following the big tech/Silicon Valley anti-labor playbook.

The type of change you would like to make to your donation - cancel

The email address that was used when the donation was made - [redacted]

The full name used - [redacted]

The amount and currency of the donation - $20 USD recurring monthly

I hope the Wikimedia Foundation rethinks its approach to the community and its workers, and establishes practices of transparency.

Thank you,

Not that I think my $240/year is going to make or break them, but maybe if they hear this from other donors they’ll rethink their choices.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Yoink. Here I go cancelling again.

[–] kobra@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish I was already a donor so I could send this email. First time I've felt regret like this, I should be more proactive about supporting things like this in the future. Thanks for sharing.

[–] Reyali@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It took me a long time and some kicks in the butt to make some of my donations recurring. Like I decided to give recurring donations to Wikimedia and the Internet Archive a few years back when Elon was attacking both of them. I’d given as one-offs when Wikipedia would prompt for donations, but was proud to make it a recurring thing.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

I've done the same. This sucks, but I didn't realize I was donating to an organization without a workers union agreement in place.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait for the editors to strike and then make shitty edits

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

I have an awesome candidate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Standing_(economist)