this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
237 points (98.8% liked)

politics

26859 readers
1749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A surprising number of Andrew Cuomo’s allies, donors, and friends have close ties to the late pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 36 points 3 months ago (4 children)

How about fucking scorched earth... Cuomo, Clinton, Trump, RFK Jr, Gates... I don't care who the hell they are, I want damn good explanation for why everyone's hanging out with this guy.

I can't even make sense of what exactly his public role supposedly was? Supposedly some of the people he associated with weren't a part of his pedo ring? Why the hell were they with him?

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure people partied with Diddy that weren't a part of his freakouts or whatever he called them. Just because you know a guy doesn't mean you are guilty by association, but some people are very guilty and you can tell by their attempt to disassociate with them publicly. Like Trump with Epstein.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah but that's kind of the point there... Diddy, at least made sense of where he was and why he was in that world.

Say you hear 15 A list celebreties are constantly going to parties at Eminem's house, I wouldn't bat an eye. You hear the same except, it's at some rich guy's house, that no one knows where he got any money, but he seems to be around celebrities all the time, you'd start to ask the question, what the hell is this guy, where is his money coming from and why is he around celebrities all the time?

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

How many investment bankers do you know about? Exactly. The only reason you are hearing and seeing this guy everywhere is because he got caught with his pants down and has connections all through parliament. How many people just like him still exist in the world and none of us are the wiser?

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I have a theory that most folks were using him to hide money to make billions. Then, there were some folks who had "every day be another wonderful secret"

Fucking EVERYONE. I do not care which party they’re aligned with, at all. If they were associated with Epstein, nail them to the fucking wall and apply the legal penalties to the maximum degree possible. And then go after literally fucking anyone who was involved in spinning, downplaying, hiding, misdirecting, obscuring, or obstructing the matter. FBI and DOJ personnel; political appointees; judges; police; lawyers; Mossad agents; fucking ANYONE who played the game and helped to brush this shit under the rug. Eviscerate them to the full extent that the law prescribes and allows. Better yet: make it a RICO case, because this was and is very fucking clearly a massive and coordinated campaign.

But that will never happen, because one of the most heinous perpetrators runs the fucking country, and the Tribunal of Six is demonstrably eager to basically just suck his dick with regards to pretty much any matter that comes before them.

I fucking hate it here so much

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why the hell were they with him?

He was just a really good accountant /s

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He already lost the primary and now he gets to lose the general where Mamdani's least embarrassing opponent is the guy who wears a red beret that he hasn't taken off since the 80s.

The Epstein powder doesn't need to be fired.