this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
909 points (98.0% liked)

memes

20024 readers
2105 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don’t get why people are fine with arming the police with military hardware like MRAPs.

they should never have access to things beyone what ordinary civilians can get

A civilian can buy an MRAP.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Civilians in america can also buy several fully automatic and semiautomatic weapons in a large caliber. I usually see police using MRAPs as deployable cover during barricaded suspect situations. Most of the time they don't just show up and drive it through the building guns blazing, they use it as cover while giving commands, often holding down the area until the barricaded suspect gives up or a SWAT team can enter and try to arrest. Typically they attempt to use non lethal methods like flashbangs and bean bags unless the suspect becomes lethally violent like charging at officers with a knife or a rifle.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

is that to the wrong house or through the wrong house? not joking, legitimately asking i've seen a few civil cases against PDs

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Here's an archived version that's not paywalled.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Any tool can be misused. I'd be curious what the percentage of wrong use cases of MRAPs is. There is a massive accountability issue with America's policing. We need to address the accountability issues, not just take all their tools away.

When a tradesman fucks up a job do you blame the tools they used or the company they work for?

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We know what happens when we arm a police force with military weapons and no accountability.

I absolutely blame the cops and the people who gave them these deadly toys.

If a tradesman "fixed" my plumbing with C4 I'd blame the plumber and the guy who gave him the explosive.

I'd rather the right-wing paramilitary not have weapons of war.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So we just send the police to go deal with the military hardware that civilians have access to with nothing? We need more accountability for when and how they use their tools and weapons rather than just taking them away.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I really don't care if cops have to deal with that. It's their job.

If they don't want to do it, find another one. The world could use fewer armed right-wing meathead goons.

Or try de-escalation for a change.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

To add:

If cops are afraid of civilians having this hardware, they're in the same boat as the rest of us. Maybe they'll have some incentive to lobby for laws that would keep all of us safe.

But instead they lobby for things like perpetuating the decades long "war on drugs," which is largely what this breach and clear shit is used for.

They want to wage war on civilians. And, really, just some civilians.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

And they make a point to be the biggest baddest and scariest. Like mother fuckers you already have the monopoly on the legitimate use of force. You'd be terrifying bringing lever action rifles and revolvers against someone with a kalishnakov, because if shit goes down bad enough you can bring in the national guard or rope in a bunch of deputies, or just the fact that yall have the power to imprison people without governments getting mad

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

Or try de-escalation for a change>

Can't find that in the manual..

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The police causes more death than the military. And until that changes, we are free to reduce the equipment and revise the training they should get.

There's no good reason for a plumber to have c4. And there is no good reason for police to have armored vehicles. It's not a building, it's just pipes, and it's not a warzone (before the police arrive), it's a city.

Oh yeah and we can absolutely expect police handle lethal encounters. It's a unique job with unique issues and if you can't handle that, get out. You don't get to cosplay military just because you feel too weak inside.

Murderous fascist dipships shpuldnt be given tools that are unacceptably dangerous (even when misused) to the community they're invading raping and looting, then.

No guns. No cars.

Im not against addressing accountability and putting a blunty on everyone within one degree close association of any cop, but the fact they steal city budget to pay for shit to kill us with is... Okay its not more insane than paying them to kill is, but its up there.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Police should not have anything the average person in the area couldn't get.

I don't give a shit about their lives. These are the tax dollars of the people who live here, and they should be spent protecting the lives of people who live here, not buying ever more baroque murder weapons.

They should not have the capacity to deploy lethal force. Their job is (supposedly) to subdue, not kill. If they were not onvaders, they shouldn't have fire arms.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You might need to dig deep, though, because the lower end starts at around $100,000, with prices reaching up to around $180,000. However, many people feel it’s a small price to pay for their family’s security.

The great thing about MRAPs is that if you miss a payment, there's nothing anyone can do about it.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

With how much money some people spend on pickups now, I feel like an entry level MRAP for $100,000 would be much cooler.

Probably worse on gas mileage than a pickup though. ;p

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It's downright affordable compared to the destroyer you haul out to the lake house you rent for family vacations.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I have very mixed feelings on this. As a person who has managed to keep hold of her sanity I'm appalled, but as an American it makes me feel a bit patriotic. America, just because it's a terrible idea to let you do it doesn't mean we aren't allowed to stop you.

Give unions machine guns again dammit.