this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
4 points (83.3% liked)
Programming
27075 readers
148 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
looks bemused
I don't do that much Lisp, mostly use it for emacs, but I'm pretty sure that it's not.
opens emacs
OK. So far so good.
Elisp sure doesn't look to be case-insensitive. Maybe he meant some specific variant? Common Lisp?
Apparently sbcl's REPL doesn't support readline.
Huh. Looks like with readline, I also get cursor flashing to do paren matching, kinda like emacs can do. I had no idea that readline could do that. Apparently Common Lisp doesn't do
setqeither.more experimentation
Huh. So, yeah, I guess that Common Lisp is case-insensitive. That is a bit wild. I guess I do remember vaguely seeing old Lisp stuff with keywords in all-caps.
Is Scheme?
Apparently the guile REPL doesn't support readline either. God.
And it looks like "print" is "display" in Scheme-land.
Okay, so that's the syntax. Case-insensitive?
Nope.
I kinda feel like there are Lisps that the author could have used if they wanted Lisp and case-sensitivity, if that was the major irritation.