this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
532 points (91.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26761 readers
251 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have no idea what must be wrong with someone's eyes to call that dress white and gold. I mean it was always a stretch, the shadow/lens on top of it would have to be fucking BLUE to color it something similar.

Even then it sounds stupid to go with that stretch of it being white and gold.

My working theory is that people who saw it gold and white were exposed to lead.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shadows do generally overrepresent the color blue due to rayleigh scattering.

Brains are also very quick to make assumptions and also very rigid about keeping them. The spinning dancer illusion, even when you already know you can and have seen it spinning both ways, it can be difficult to switch percepts.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get the illusion with the blue radiograph halfway down, but I've never been able to easily switch the dancer.

Sometimes I can and sometimes I can't. When I looked this up earlier, I was able to switch twice. But yeah, if I'm just staring at it, it's basically impossible.

I switched the first time because I looked at the reflection underneath the dancer, and that seemed to remove just enough visual context that I could reorient my perception.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like this post illustrates pretty cleanly how someone would see that

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The background is not blue in the original though?

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly lol. The rest of the scene had clear context that the image was overexposed and the white balance was too warm.

Anyone that understands photography instantly understood what was happening in that image. I've had people try to fight me and tell me I'm wrong about that, but I've been a professional photographer/videographer for over 15 years. Quickly identifying a technical issue with an image like that is like breathing to me. I do it every single time I take a picture, so over 10,000 a day on average. All I can say is trust me. that image was overexposed and too warm, You can tell by the way it is in the background, and if you can't see that then my words won't help you.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People view the image in different conditions. There's so many factors involved. How bright your surroundings are, the make and size of your display device, how you perceive colors. Professionals perform color grading to avoid ambiguity like this in movies and such. Even your cultural expectations are hypothesized to change how you perceive the dress. (Eg. living in a desert environment can make you expect more yellow shading)

There's a similar illusion called the spinning dancer, where some people simply cannot see the image spinning one way or the other, while some can even switch between them. There's more information in the dress to make an objective assessment, but if that information isn't observed or obscured by the aforementioned reasons, it's totally understandable. That's what OP's image is showing.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I struggle to see it as black and blue, the white and gold interpretation has been the one I've almost always seen

It's not a stretch by any means

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you called your optometrist in the last 5 years?

[–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago

That you still think the issue is in the eyes instead of how the brain interprets the colour means you have an understanding problem.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was exposed to lead and yet I only saw blue and black.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

There goes my theory! Damn! :)

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was able, very briefly and not since, to see white and gold. Otherwise, I thought they were all crazy.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same! I wish I could flit between like I can with most illusions. I'm just happy I know I saw it the other way once at least.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

It's a weird type of illusion because even knowing the truth I can only see the white and gold, even when the lighting in the photo is adjusted to correct the overexposure my brain still reads it as white.