this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
1334 readers
50 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"I’m pretty sure there were Celtics or Picts in the Netherlands before Germanic/Frankish tribes" I think we might just have a completely different view of settler colonialism here if you think settler colonialism predated capitalism. Settler colonialism is not mere demographic change though settler colonialism always leads to demographic change, thinking that can lead to some dangerous conclusions.
Malaysia was a bad example, so my bad on that. I think I need to study that topic further. I was under the impression that though it does have internal settler colonies, it as a whole isn't a settler colony, but the comment below makes me think twice on that.
Malaysia is a settler colony due to their possession of Sarawak in Borneo and the first peoples of the Malay peninsula.
Just casting a very wide net for all the different definitions I'm used to getting.
Considering that the Han ethnic group started settling Taiwan long before the advent of capitalism, and that the island has no significant natural resources to pilfer/extract, I think you can safely conclude that it's not a settler colony.