this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
185 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
85108 readers
4682 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's important to differentiate between being a monopoly, and engaging in monopolistic behavior.
Valve, to the best of my knowledge, isn't doing anything that prevents or stifles competition. As a monopoly it's important to investigate them from time to time to ensure this remains true. But if they're just putting out the best product and everyone is choosing to use them, then it's not really a problem.
Forced price matching could be considered a abuse of their position. If a dev cannot sell on another store for less (even if that platform takes a smaller cut) then that makes reduces the need for others to use a different platform to get a cheaper deal. Devs cannot use pricing to save you some money while drawing you to a platform that gives them a larger margin. All of which means that there is less incentive for valve to reduce their cut of the sale to be more competitive. This is what some lawsuits against valve are arguing ATM I believe.
But that rule is only when using steam keys for distribution on other platforms no?
Yes (or at least it was how it used to be, don't know if it has changed) if you were selling steam keys outside of steam you should price match the steam price. If you are distributing the game some other way you can set any price you want.
I think this is true, because I've definitely seen games on sale at Epic that have lower price than their Steam version.
But then I get into the quandry if I want to "own" it on Epic's platform over Steam, and I usually don't 🫤
I don't play enough games to have a poney in this race, but why do you care if you are already using Epics platform for some games? What benefits does steam platform bring that others don't?
All the extra's it brings;
Epic has:
Epic has had plenty of time to copy the success of Steam by just using their blueprint, but they won't switch to being customer friendly, so instead Tim Sweeny (Epic CEO) is just hating on them (Valve). The other launchers are just terrible to begin with, the EA launcher has been buggy from the start and really unstable, Uplay is equally as bad. The only real competitor is GOG in my opinion, but they are small in comparison to Steam.
EDIT : Found it.
I've seen this being said mostly on reddit but haven't seen any source/reference to this claim. Is this like an NDA that devs sign ? Has anyone reported on this/archived it ?
OK, where?
I forgot to share the url. It's this one.
Warning : you can't opt out of cookies for reason
I typed "found it" after just seeing the post/headline on lemmy, but reading through the article, the allegations are from Ubisoft and fucking WB for 2 of their micro transaction heavy games. I don't think this is what many people were lead to believe with the comments here. I initially thought the allegations were from poor indie devs. I don't fucking care what Ubisoft and WB does, they are not saints either.
There are some games tbat are sold on both steam and other platforms. Many of these games have external modding communities. Steam provides slick integration for "workshop" mods, which helps drive sales.
A few years back steam used to allow fairly open API access if you acquired the game elsewhere and just wanted the mods. And then they turned it off, but still allow direct anonymous downloads. A decision that only makes sense if they wanted to lock in any steam-adopted community to make going elsewhere difficult.
Turning off something people were using to avoid potential competitors is kinda exactly what would count as "monopolistic behavior" if Steam were to be ruled a monopoly by a court