this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
379 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

85134 readers
4484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 77 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Actually, the headline isn't wrong, you just read it wrong.

The article specifies:

  • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
  • 1.2 GW peak output
  • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 60 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

I am also fascinated by the measurement “two soccer fields.” Americans largely play soccer on American football fields, so any American would just say “two football fields.” But everyone else hates calling it “soccer” and prefer to use metric rather than comparisons? This just seems like they chose all their measurements to be maximally irritating.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, nobody play soccer in Switzerland, they play football, how would they know how big is soccer field?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 21 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Calling it two football field would still work. Americans would think brown oblong ball field, everyone else would think black and white orb game. In in all cases they'd be thinking of essentially the same measurement.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 5 points 20 hours ago

Right?! It’s just so puzzling a choice.

[–] banause@feddit.org 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's exactly what the original comment said?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

I think it was alluding to it, but stopped short of explicitly saying it. I felt it was worth explicitly saying.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Aren't soccer fields like 20% larger usually?

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because main concern when using soccer/football fields as measurement is accuracy

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Its as precise as a banana

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah. A lot of USLW games are played in gridiron stadiums, and the touchline is way further out than the sideline. They’re not required to be strictly uniform like gridiron, though, it’s more like a baseball diamond in that regard, so I’m not sure if they’re strictly wider, or just usually wider.

[–] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 27 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

My interpretation is that it can go from no output up to 1.2GW in milliseconds. Do most big batteries take more time to ramp up to high output?

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

These systems support a latent load so it’s not all at once. Something like this but at a massive scale.

https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva670a/slva670a.pdf

Very cool engineering.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Yep! In just 86500000 milliseconds. 🫡