this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
76 points (98.7% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
4365 readers
60 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did we replace something or are we just eating more?
It’s my understanding that it’s cheaper, healthier, and more environmentally friendly than beef, and I’d bet its growth is inversely correlated to beef consumption.
Also it’s the staple protein for people who are trying to be more fit because of how lean parts like the breast can be.
Wait until they figure out about mushrooms, seitan, tofu etc. Nevermind, suddenly it's not about health and protein anymore.
Taste, convenience and local availability all matter too. In fact there’s a whole massive ecosystem of influences creating the observable change that we are talking about.
There’s also a whole massive ecosystem of changes that haven’t created the change you want here.
Does taste and convenience matter more than cruelty and violence?
This is a conversation about why a broad group of people have certain behaviors, and the observations I made were in regards to the common “why” for that broad group of people.
You’re trying to make the conversation about why those people making those decisions are wrong in your opinion, but that wasn’t what we were talking about. We were talking about “why” they were making their decisions, not “was their decision moral”.
You’re getting downvotes because you’re trying to have a different conversation than was being had, and don’t seem to be understanding that.
This is a narrow take. You can switch from beef to chicken to be healthier. You're not saying i want to eat the healthiest version regardless of when I enjoy, you're saying between these two meats I enjoy, chicken is the healthier protein. It's not a lie that it's about health just because they're not following your standards
Chicken is one of the most powerful obesogens in your diet. The chicken that you are eating has almost nothing in common nutritionally with the ones grown in 1961.
Meat is not healthy for anyone and chicken is one of the most concerning meats available for its health consequences. The more meat a human eats in their lifetime, the younger they die and the more major diseases they experience. The top killers of humans this year are all directly caused by or closely related to meat consumption.
"Protein" is not a meaningful nutritional category for the average person. If you are getting enough calories from whole plants, you are automatically getting enough protein. Protein does not have to be supplemented.
It's also relevant to this discussion that chickens are the most abused animal on the planet. There are almost 27 billion chickens living in atrocity right now. The experiences of animals are real and matter.
I think you’re mistaking me as some kind of crusader who is trying to evangelize chicken or something instead of someone observing what the general perception is relevant to the conversation.
I'm simply correcting your misstatements for the benefit of others. It's unfortunate if they have somehow upset you; the realities of animal exploitation we avoid thinking about are indeed quite upsetting, and I don't believe in protecting people from that.
poor people can't afford meat. when their incomes rise, the first thing they do is buy more meat.
chicken is the cheapest meat. it also remains cheap while beef/fish/pork has skyrocketed in costs, making them far less affordable.
pork a lot of times can be cheaper than chicken quality of cut wise. Most pork is closer to boneless skinless chicken breast. You can get roasts and such that is really beyond what you can even get form chicken and a bit closer to beef.
The "we" here is global, so I don't think your question has a neat answer that can be applied in all regions.
From the report:
This chart is not talking about causes but it is interesting:
More protein is consumed overall in higher income countries but less is coming from plants and more from animals.
So: