politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I always wonder who is behind those one or two downvotes on things like this. Is it Miller or Bannon? I could see them trying to go onto lemmy to see what the left is thinking. It cracks me up. Maybe it's eric?
Mystery down votes are a common internet phenomenon that, despite knowing it's widespread, I've never quite been able to figure out. Accidental downvotes do happen, especially on mobile in my experience, but at nowhere near a frequent enough rate to explain down votes in the wild. In this case, there's many possibilities! Are the downvotes from MAGAssholes? Is someone just blanket down voting because they don't like the instance? Because they don't like the community? Because they don't like the user posting it? Because they don't like the BBC as a source? Because they downvote every US politics thing they come across? Who knows!
In this case, butthurt conservatives, it would seem.
Some people also just don't like meme type replies, or low-effort posts, or any number of things that might not be related to the content.
There are also mass downvoters, but people have a tendency to try to extract simple patterns out of a sea of different people doing different things.
Usually if I have had a disagreement with somebody, where my facts were correct, they are mad maybe, so then they go downvote my posts or comments as some weird retaliation
The person is complaining about rigged elections being fake news. Someone is going to be upset. Even if we see cycled parties, it isn't proof there hasn't been any trickery. In the US it would mean focusing on a specific battleground state.
Elon was heavily hinting at helping do funny shit, saying that Trump wouldn't have won without him. I've seen reports from staticians talking about oddness about the last one.
So yeah I think there's plenty to disagree about, even if you're not MAGA.
I'm...confused. By "the person is complaining about rigged elections being fake news," do you mean the journalist who challenged Trump on his claim? The specific exchange as indicated in the article was:
I wouldn't call that complaining about the entire idea of rigged elections being fake news, but rather challenging Trump to provide evidence for his own claims of specific elections being rigged, which he insulted the journalist and then ended the interview over instead of defending his claims with evidence.
Bannon: "Well, I better piss my pants before I jump online"
The comment: Sat@lemmy.world
The post: noattention@lemmy.world
This comment: InfernoWarrior@piefed.social