this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
186 points (98.9% liked)
Privacy
4638 readers
213 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Has the same kind of simpering tone you'd get out of an LLM.
Which doesn't mean it was written by an LLM. This has been standard corporate speak from before LLMs existed.
Meanwhile im positively surprised that there is no "sorry you are offended"-BS at all in this statement.
What do you think LLMs were trained off of, my friend?
Or any PR firm, which is why they talk like that in the first place.
This does make me wonder if the AI simpers differently in different languages.
Are you familiar with the works of Shao Yu?
Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
... not used an LLM to write their apology?
I mean, I'm satisfied. This indicates to me they don't care. That's all I need to hear.
There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this... it's not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Would you have preferred no apology at all?
And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼